If a slave says to his master, "You are not my master." If convicted, his master shall cut off his ear.
The expression due process of the law refers to the protection given to citizens against unfair actions by the government.
Not really. The Judicial Branch is responsible for ensuring a law follows the principles of the Constitution. Unconstitutional laws may also be fundamentally unfair; however, a court cannot overturn a law based on perceived "unfairness" alone, as most people would define the concept. Many laws are unfair to certain people or groups (Jim Crow laws were extremely unfair to African-Americans), but the judicial system is only concerned with whether a law is faithful to constitutional principles (Jim Crow laws were also unconstitutional). The courts may uphold a law that seems unfair, and may be arguably unconstitutional, if the government can demonstrate the law serves a compelling and legitimate government interest and is written narrowly, so that it accomplishes its purpose with as little negative impact as possible.
people should resist unfair laws (apex)
The Judicial Branch, although their task isn't to search for fairness, only for the constitutionality of a law.Any court, but particularly the US Supreme Court, can review laws relevant to cases being tried or appealed before that court to ensure their constitutionality, but they don't scrutinize them for "fairness," as most people would define the concept.Many laws are unfair to certain people or groups, but the judicial system is only concerned with whether a law is faithful to constitutional principles.In order to overturn an "unfair" law, someone first has to convince the Court that the law directly violates a real person's (or people's) constitutional rights and causes harm to that person (or people). Even then, the courts may uphold a law that seems unfair, and may be arguably unconstitutional, if the government can demonstrate the law serves a compelling and legitimate government interest and is written narrowly, so that it accomplishes its purpose with as little negative impact as possible.
protection from unfair actions by the goverment
Historians found it to be just.
282
Hammurabi wanted the law to be known to all citizens.
The Hammurabi's code is the first known codified series of law to exist.
Laws needed to be interpreted by impartial judges
It was the first codes of law codified in sub categories.
It is quite obvious, it was used for knowing the laws, lol, By Stormy
Many lost their land when Anglos passes an unfair law. -apex
A fair law is for EVERYONE . What I mean by everyone is the race & religon . An unfair law is for a certain kind of person. Like Slavery .
It made the laws more uniform, objective, and impartial
The earliest known code of law was the Hammurabi code. It was the first laws codified together.
A. Kelly Gill has written: 'Fox on Canadian law of trade-marks and unfair competition' -- subject(s): Competition, Unfair, Trademarks, Unfair Competition