The proviso would limit the spread of slavery- NoVaNeT :]
The proviso would limit the spread of slavery- NoVaNeT :]
The Wilmot Provisio passed in the House of Representatives, because the amount of representatives per state depends on the population. The population of all of the northern states was greater than that of the southern states. This means that since there were more Northern Representatives, it was passed. However, the amount of senators per state is the same regardless of population. In some sense, the power between the North and South was much more equal in the Senate as opposed to the House. That is why the Wilmot Provisio was passed in the House, but not the Senate.
Southern politicians opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it aimed to ban slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico, which they viewed as a direct threat to their economic interests and way of life. They believed that the expansion of slavery was essential for the agricultural economy of the South. Additionally, Southerners feared that the Proviso would upset the balance of power between free and slave states in Congress, jeopardizing their political influence. This opposition highlighted the growing sectional tensions that eventually contributed to the Civil War.
Southerners opposed the Wilmot Proviso. This is because the Wilmot Proviso established peace with Mexico, and the land that Mexico owned was in the South.
The proviso would limit the spread of slavery- NoVaNeT :]
The proviso would limit the spread of slavery- NoVaNeT :]
Wilmot Provisio tried to end slavery in the Mexico section
The Wilmot Provisio passed in the House of Representatives, because the amount of representatives per state depends on the population. The population of all of the northern states was greater than that of the southern states. This means that since there were more Northern Representatives, it was passed. However, the amount of senators per state is the same regardless of population. In some sense, the power between the North and South was much more equal in the Senate as opposed to the House. That is why the Wilmot Provisio was passed in the House, but not the Senate.
The Wilmot Provisio passed in the House of Representatives, because the amount of representatives per state depends on the population. The population of all of the northern states was greater than that of the southern states. This means that since there were more Northern Representatives, it was passed. However, the amount of senators per state is the same regardless of population. In some sense, the power between the North and South was much more equal in the Senate as opposed to the House. That is why the Wilmot Provisio was passed in the House, but not the Senate.
The proviso would limit the spread of slavery- NoVaNeT :]
Wilmot Provisio tried to end slavery in the Mexico section
Southern politicians opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it aimed to ban slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico, which they viewed as a direct threat to their economic interests and way of life. They believed that the expansion of slavery was essential for the agricultural economy of the South. Additionally, Southerners feared that the Proviso would upset the balance of power between free and slave states in Congress, jeopardizing their political influence. This opposition highlighted the growing sectional tensions that eventually contributed to the Civil War.
Southerners opposed the Wilmot Proviso. This is because the Wilmot Proviso established peace with Mexico, and the land that Mexico owned was in the South.
they opposed to it
Southern politicians opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it aimed to prohibit slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico following the Mexican-American War. They viewed the proviso as a direct threat to the institution of slavery and the rights of slaveholders, fearing it would limit their economic and political power. Additionally, they believed that states should have the right to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery, seeing the proviso as an infringement on states' rights. This opposition was rooted in the broader context of maintaining a balance of power between free and slave states in Congress.
The South opposed it.