The English were so well because they were a world power. They had strong armies and were successful in many other areas as well. You will see this if you view a map from the time period they controlled America, they controlled many other areas as well.
People came from everywhere in Europe. There were Germans, Irish, Scottish, Swede, Italian, Dutch, to name a few.
English. They left the fledgling US for British colonies because they remained loyal, so it stands to reason they felt more British than American.
Although the British colonies started later than both the French and Spanish, it quickly outpaced both in North America. The English colonists were better fed, clothed, and housed than their counterparts. One reason for this was that the French and Spanish colonies were characterized by strong central control exercised by the monarchy. It helped them to get off the mark quickly, but in the end hindered innovation and their ability to deal with changing circumstances. Both the French and Spanish empires were vast. The English colonies were tightly grouped along the Atlantic coastline. This provided them with communication and transportation benefits.
The first permanent colony was Jamestown. While it did not prosper in the beginning it was the first colony never to be completely abandoned. During and after the leadership of John Smith things started to look up for the colony, and while it hit a few more major stumbling blocks it eventually became a successful enterprise
Under English rule, the treatment of enslaved Africans often became more codified and harsh, with laws increasingly solidifying racial distinctions and lifetime servitude, as seen in the Virginia Slave Codes. In contrast, under Dutch rule, while slavery existed, there was a relatively greater emphasis on integration and the possibility of manumission, with some enslaved individuals able to buy their freedom or gain rights over time. The Dutch system also allowed for more social mobility and interaction between enslaved and free individuals compared to the rigid racial hierarchies that developed under English colonialism. Overall, the English approach leaned towards stricter control and dehumanization, while the Dutch system offered limited avenues for freedom and social interaction.
Life for women in English colonies often revolved around domestic responsibilities and family roles, with a focus on marriage and child-rearing. In contrast, women in Dutch colonies experienced greater autonomy and involvement in economic activities, as the Dutch allowed them more rights to own property and run businesses. This difference stemmed from varying cultural attitudes towards gender roles, with the Dutch valuing women's contributions to the economy more than the English. Consequently, Dutch women enjoyed a relatively higher status and independence compared to their English counterparts.
Life for women in Dutch colonies often afforded them more legal rights and economic opportunities compared to their counterparts in English colonies. In Dutch society, women could own property, run businesses, and engage in trade, reflecting a more egalitarian approach to gender roles. In contrast, English colonies were generally more patriarchal, with women's rights largely limited to domestic spheres and dependent on their husbands or fathers. This divergence stemmed from differing cultural attitudes and legal frameworks established by the colonial powers.
In Dutch colonies, women often enjoyed more legal rights and social independence compared to their counterparts in English colonies. For instance, Dutch women could own property, run businesses, and had more opportunities for involvement in economic activities. In contrast, English colonial society was more patriarchal, with women typically relegated to domestic roles and having limited legal rights. This difference reflected broader cultural attitudes toward gender roles in the respective colonial powers.
Fewer Dutch than English immigrated to the American colonies primarily due to the Netherlands' relatively stable economic and political conditions during the 17th century, which reduced the urgency for emigration. Additionally, the Dutch had established a strong trading presence in the Americas, particularly in New Netherland (now New York), which allowed them to prosper without needing to settle permanently. In contrast, many English settlers sought greater religious freedom and economic opportunities, prompting larger waves of emigration. Furthermore, the English colonies expanded more rapidly and aggressively, attracting more English migrants.
Dutch colonization efforts in New Amsterdam most closely resembled English colonization in the middle colonies. Both the Dutch and the English established diverse, commercially-oriented settlements that encouraged trade and attracted immigrants from various backgrounds. Additionally, the focus on religious tolerance and relative autonomy for settlers in both regions facilitated a multicultural society. This contrasts with the more homogeneous and agrarian-focused settlements seen in the southern colonies.
The French did not settle in the Middle Colonies of America. The Middle Colonies were predominantly settled by English, Dutch, and German immigrants. The French focused their colonial efforts more in present-day Canada and regions along the Mississippi River.
The children were becoming more Dutch than English and the Dutch weren't as strict about what to do and not to do on Sunday's as the Sepratists.
It was English tea on English ships. The smugglers who brought in Dutch tea at a cheaper selling price were upset because the English had LOWERED the taxes on the English tea making their tea more pricey. This is why it was thrown into Boston Harbor (not the myth about higher taxes). Hamilton had a hand in it since he was one of the largest smugglers of Dutch products in the colonies.
the French settlements in North America was slower than English colonies because the English colonies had more slaves
Spain and France reached out further, claiming more area, than Britain and needed more resources from those colonies to support their massive effort to take still more colonies while managing the ones they had. Also, the Spanish were unusually brutal for the period and created more rebellion over that brutality.
The more southern colonies.
with the diversity came tolerance for religious and cultural differences