0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Blake
Judy
ReneAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Your mother is a very angry person. she had a bad childhood. you are the youngest and still at home it all out on you. what can you do?
Maybe sit down and talk to her about getting some sort of therapy? Maybe you could suggest that you would like the two of you to get closer, and ask if she would come with you to something like that. Or, maybe see if there is some sort of low-key activities you could do that would lower her anxiety level?
What were Nathaniel Gorham's views on slavery and voting?
Nathaniel Gorham was a delegate to the Constitutional Convention and a key figure in the early days of the American Republic. His views on slavery and voting reflected the complex and often contradictory attitudes of his time. Slavery: Gorham, like many of his contemporaries, was ambivalent about slavery. He was a Northern delegate from Massachusetts, where slavery was less entrenched than in the Southern states. During the Constitutional Convention, Gorham supported the continuation of the institution of slavery, reflecting the broader compromises made to secure the unity of the new nation. For example, he supported the Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted enslaved people as three-fifths of a person for purposes of taxation and representation. Voting: Gorham's views on voting were influenced by the political and social context of the time. He was involved in the debates over the structure of the new government, including issues related to representation and the role of the electorate. The early voting rights were limited, and property requirements often restricted who could vote. Gorham's focus was more on creating a stable framework for governance rather than on expanding democratic participation. Overall, Gorham’s views on these issues were shaped by the prevailing norms and compromises of the era, reflecting a complex interplay between his personal beliefs and the political realities READ MORE : tinyurl .com/nhe5sm3y
What is the meaning of hypocondriac?
A hypochondriac is a person who "enjoys" being sick. They spend much of their time thinking about themselves and their bodies, and worry constantly about being sick or having something happen to them. They are obsessed with germs, diseases, illnesses, injuries, and other bodily complaints. Many times, these people worry about being sick so much that they actually make themselves feel bad, which is why doctors sometimes tell them that "it is all in your head." A hypochondriac can read about a disease, and will think that they have the symptoms of the disease, or they can convince themselves that something in their body is damaged or diseased. Therapy and medication can help hypochondriacs to stop worrying and enjoy their lives.
What is a living amends in AAA?
There is no such thing as a "living amends" in the book Alcoholics Anonymous.Recovery is conceptual, and the formula to achieve a spiritual awakening can only be found in doingthe clear cut directions that are outline in the pages 58-103 in the Big Book.This concept of "living amends" is an great example of "watering down" the 12 step program, for non-alcoholics (hard drinkers), who make the vocal majority of AA in 2009.A Real Alcoholic (page 21 BB- "lose all control of his liquor consumption") who buys this "half measure" will drink and die of alcoholism.Big Book page 79 - "Although these reparations take innumerable forms, there are some general principles which we find guiding. Reminding ourselves that we have decided to go to any lengths to find a spiritual experience, we ask that we be given strength and direction to do the right thing, no matter what the personal consequences may be. We may lose our position or reputation or face jail, but we are willing. We have to be. We must not shrink at anything. "The objective of A.A. is SPIRITUAL AWAKENING. AA is not therapy. AA is not self help. AA is not a temperance or abstinence movement. AA is a spiritual program of action. Sobriety is the dividend of being spiritually awake, every day. GOD Bless!
The Senate rarely rejects Presidential Cabinet appointees?
It's true that the Senate rarely rejects presidential Cabinet appointees, but it does happen from time to time. Most appointees are confirmed without major issues, as Presidents typically select candidates who are generally acceptable to the Senate. However, there are instances where the Senate has rejected or stalled confirmations due to concerns over the appointee’s qualifications, past conduct, or policy positions. For example: **John Tower** (1989): Tower, nominated by President George H.W. Bush for Secretary of Defense, was rejected by the Senate due to concerns over his personal behavior and past conduct. **Ronald Reagan’s Cabinet**: In Reagan's administration, there were several contentious confirmations, such as the failed nomination of **Lynne Cheney** for the position of Secretary of Education in 1986, although not all were ultimately rejected. **Gina Haspel** (2018): Haspel's nomination for CIA Director faced significant scrutiny due to her past involvement with controversial interrogation techniques, though she was ultimately confirmed. The Senate's role in reviewing and confirming nominees is an important check on executive power, ensuring that appointees are fit for their positions and aligned with READ MORE : tinyurl .com/nhe5sm3y
