Vampire folklore was around long before the discovery of vampire bats in South American in the 16th century. These bats (which feed on blood) were named after the folkloric vampire (not the other way around). The only thing that relates a fictional vampire and a real vampire bat is the name.
supporting article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vampire#Vampire_bats
That's not real no vampires or vampire bats are not real...
Vampires live FOREVER. Bats don't ...
Vampires can transform into bats, specifically the vampire bat.
Vampire bats yes, real vampires no.
vampire bats are different from other bats because vampire bats suck blood and they have sharp teeth. Other bats dont suck blood. Other bats have sharp teeth but not sharp enough to bite people and animals,thats how vampire bats are different from other bats!
No, vampire bats suck the blood of other animals, but they do not turn into vampires because there is no such thing as a vampire. They are mythological creatures and do not exist in reality.
NO Only vampire bats
Vampire bats? Yes. Human vampires? Definitely NO.
Vampires live as long as humans do generally.
There is no such a thing as vampires... but there is such a thing as vampire bats. And no, vampires do not have the same powers as Twilight vampires do.
No. While one group known as vampire bats do drink blood, they are not vampires in the mythological sense. Most bats feed primarily on insects, while others feed on fruit.
Vampires bats can be turned into anything to the storys