Their doodles would expand because of lack of water and evantually tear the female in half
There would be no land
on land , frogs breathe with the help of lungs , and in water , with the help of gills.
frogs can only live on land if they are wet, all animals from this catagory do this. However, frogs cant survive on land if they are dry. They way frogs breath is much different from most animals,frogs not only breath through lungs, but also through their skin. Frogs can only breath when wet.
kangaroos jump high, but frogs jump low. frogs also land on there front legs while kangaroos land on their heels.
Yes, frogs are amphibious creatures. Toads on the other hand spend more time on land than frogs do, but are still amphibians.
Alexander The Great was probably good, because he tried to make all the land he conquered live in peace, but that didn't happen. Considering he is called 'the great' I would assume not.
they have land frogs and aquatic. tree frogs, fire belly toads, and that's all I know of.
well frogs have legs and can live on land in addition to the water.
Frogs have moist skin that needs to stay damp to breathe through their skin. On land, their skin can dry out quickly, leading to dehydration and difficulty breathing. Additionally, frogs lay their eggs in water, so they need to be near water to reproduce.
No. It has a solid surface.
Mostly insects.
tree land