Historians rely on artifacts, oral tradition and written records to answer questions about the past. Artifacts are materials left behind by cultures, oral traditions are stories that have survived through ancestry and written records can be non fiction or fiction.
It was in a way a religion, they made it to help understand the unknown.
hell... how am i supposed to no
Research into the source. Everyone has an axe to grind, an angle and a purpose. Each of these will colour the viewpoint as no one is truly objective. Once you understand what the motives of a source are you can examine it more clearly. For instance, a medieval writer trying to get noticed and seek advancement from the king will want to flatter and gloss over the negative and exaggerate the positive. They may want to make the king seem more intelligent, more courageous in battle, or more fearsome so any passages written about a battle would need to be verified to be trustworthy. If another, independent, source agrees with the sequence of events or sentiments expressed then it could be that the version is more trustworthy, as long as that second source isn't using the first as its basis or has the same set of motivations. For instance, we can know that the Battle of Hastings was fought at the place now called Battle as all sources, English and Norman agree. There also has been archaelogical evidence discovered to back it up. That will allow you to trust a the sources more. But where a source is the only one to attest something, then only examination of it can help.
i have no clue but im pretty shure if six graders neeed help me im gonna well we are gonna want the answer so any body
A primary source is a source from someone who was there. A diary, or letters from a soldier, for example, help us understand the war from his specific point of view.
Dictionaries
Dictionaries
By analyzing internal consistency within the source itself, such as language, writing style, and content. This can help determine if the source is likely to be from the claimed time period and author.
Historians will help us.
Yes, a map can be considered a primary source if it was created at the time of the events or period being studied. It provides firsthand geographical and spatial information that can help researchers understand historical context.
it helped historians understand egypt pasts because it told them how to understand hieroglyphics and other languages
by annilising what they used and their traditions................................................................................................................................... ..................................................... ........................................................................................... ....................................................... ............................................................................................................ ................................ .............................................................................................................................................. ............................................. ..........................................................................................................................
a Charleston Mercury editorial published in 1860
a Charleston Mercury editorial published in 1860
Primary source documents provide firsthand accounts and original evidence from the time period being studied, offering a direct window into the past. They can provide insight into the perspectives, beliefs, and experiences of people from that era, helping us to gain a more nuanced and authentic understanding of historical events. By analyzing primary sources, historians can uncover different interpretations, challenge existing narratives, and piece together a more accurate depiction of the past.
1.Historiography is the study of the history and methodology of the discipline of history. 2.Historiography is the study of the way history has been and is written. Historians often ask questions about the past in order to understand the present, historians use a variety of methods to help them answer questions about what happened in the past and historians examine evidence and draw conclusions as they answer historical questions. Methods historians use to help them answer questions about what happened in the past... Primary Sources • Primary source-something created by person who witnessed event - letters, diaries, eyewitness articles, videos, speeches, artifacts Secondary Sources • Secondary source-created after event by person who didnʼt witness it - books, paintings, media reports based on primary sources - appear after event and can provide more balanced view of event Oral History • Some cultures have no written records. • Oral history-unwritten verbal accounts of events - stories, customs, songs, histories, traditions - passed from generation to generation There is a important fact for historians to understand the past so it could be recorded aproperly.