It wouldn't of changed much, other European countries also colonized the American continent, the Spanish would of tried again
If the Aztecs had defeated the Spanish, the course of history in the Americas and Europe could have been significantly altered. The preservation and expansion of Aztec culture, religion, and governance might have led to a more centralized and powerful indigenous empire, potentially staving off European colonization for a longer period. This could have resulted in a different trajectory for the development of both North and South America, impacting trade, demographics, and cultural exchanges. Additionally, European powers might have approached the Americas differently, possibly leading to alternative alliances and conflicts in global history.
I don't know what history books you've been reading or who taught you history at school but the Aztecs never settled in England.
the answer is *A* native resentment against the aztec and inca
Hades, in all the battles he has been, has not been defeated.
The Aztec Empire in what we now call Mexico fell victim to the Spanish conquistador, Cortes'. He captured the Aztec ruler and disgraced him and the Spanish were aided by Native Tribes who had been victims of the Aztecs.
If the Aztecs had defeated the Spanish, the course of history in the Americas and Europe could have been significantly altered. The preservation and expansion of Aztec culture, religion, and governance might have led to a more centralized and powerful indigenous empire, potentially staving off European colonization for a longer period. This could have resulted in a different trajectory for the development of both North and South America, impacting trade, demographics, and cultural exchanges. Additionally, European powers might have approached the Americas differently, possibly leading to alternative alliances and conflicts in global history.
The Spanish had superior weaponry to the Aztecs, and were aided by rival tribes who resented Aztec rule. The primary reason may have been the effect of the diseases spread to the Aztecs by the Spanish. Lacking any immunity to these diseases, many of the Aztecs became seriously ill or died.
If the Aztecs had defeated the Spanish, the course of history in the Americas would likely have changed dramatically. The Aztec Empire could have expanded its influence and potentially unified other indigenous nations against European colonization, preserving their cultures and systems of governance. This victory might have delayed European colonization, leading to a different trajectory of trade, technology exchange, and cultural interactions. Additionally, the presence of a powerful indigenous empire could have altered the dynamics of global power during the Age of Exploration.
I don't know what history books you've been reading or who taught you history at school but the Aztecs never settled in England.
I believe the cortez and his men could have easily been destroyed and overcome by the sheer numbers of aztecs as compared to spanish, irregardless of the spanish advantage of horses and gun powder. However, due to the greed of men for wealth, and the aztec technological disadvantage, history would have only been delayed, as the aztec were a wealthy and yet technologically weak society. Similar to modern day oil rich Iraq compared to America. As they say, history repeats itself.7
Spanish conquistador Hernando Cortes' was able to defeat Montezuma and the Aztec empire by the use of force and with the help of native tribes who had been conquered by the Aztecs. Cortes' soldiers also had firearms that destroyed Aztec warriors. Montezuma had been disgraced when he was captured by Cortes.
The Spanish came to central America and delivered diseases such as Smallpox, Measles and Influenza to the Aztecs. The Aztecs, unlike the Spanish, were definitely not immune to the diseases and caught them, making them weak and forcing them to lose the battle between them. Although the Aztecs captured and sacrificed many of the Spanish, the Spanish resulted in taking over the capital city of Tenochtitlan and defeating all the Aztecs. The Spanish at one point tried to spread the Catholic religion throughout Mexico, forcing Aztecs to learn more about God and the Bible. If children didn't learn their lesson about it, they were punished. They were forced to stop worshiping their gods and celebrating their festivals. They were also made to work in Spanish mines or on estates.
The Spanish had superior weaponry to the Aztecs, and were aided by rival tribes who resented Aztec rule. The primary reason may have been the effect of the diseases spread to the Aztecs by the Spanish. Lacking any immunity to these diseases, many of the Aztecs became seriously ill or died.
Massacred them; the arrival of the Spanish, particularly Cortes, their leader, having been welcomed by the Aztecs as the long-awaited return of their god Qetzalcoatl, the 'plumed serpent'. After initial good relations between the Spaniards and Aztecs there were complications caused by political intervention on both sides, and the situation deteriorated to the point of the aforementioned massacre and destruction of the capital Tenochtitlan, despite the Spanish being vastly outnumbered by the Aztecs, but possessing firearms and horses.
The Aztecs did not have horses prior to the arrival of the Spanish conquistadors, so they did not have a tradition of breeding or using them for transportation or warfare. When the Spanish introduced horses to the Aztecs, there would not have been a significant difference in speed between Aztec horses and Spanish horses.
the answer is *A* native resentment against the aztec and inca
The Aztec Empire in what we now call Mexico fell victim to the Spanish conquistador, Cortes'. He captured the Aztec ruler and disgraced him and the Spanish were aided by Native Tribes who had been victims of the Aztecs.