He used the same techniques of retaining local government with provincial governors appointed by him. It's just that he had a much vaster area to control.
Civilizations rise and fall out of revolution (economic, political etc.). Usually a war of some kind where they are overtaken and the rule of that civilization is defeated. This may create the rise of a civilization where their is a new power ruling.
Both Aztec rule in Mesoamerica and Mongol rule in Central Asia were characterized by expansive empires that relied on military conquest and tribute systems to maintain control over diverse populations. Each empire integrated various cultures and peoples, promoting a degree of cultural exchange, yet exerted significant power through centralized authority and taxation. Additionally, both civilizations utilized advanced administrative techniques to manage their vast territories effectively. Ultimately, their dominance was marked by a blend of military prowess and strategic governance.
Alexander the Great's conquests were driven by a combination of personal ambition, the desire to unite the Greek city-states under Macedonian rule, and the legacy of his father, King Philip II. After consolidating power in Greece, he sought to expand his empire, motivated by a vision of spreading Hellenistic culture and revenge against Persia for its earlier invasions of Greece. His military genius, innovative tactics, and the loyalty of his troops enabled him to achieve rapid victories across Asia Minor, Egypt, and Persia, establishing one of the largest empires in history.
The Spanish Conquest of the Aztec and Inca empires led to the significant loss of life among indigenous populations due to warfare and the introduction of diseases like smallpox. Additionally, it resulted in the collapse of these powerful civilizations and the establishment of Spanish colonial rule, which facilitated the extraction of wealth, particularly silver, and the spread of Christianity throughout the Americas. This conquest also initiated a long-lasting cultural exchange and transformation, often to the detriment of indigenous traditions and social structures.
In ancient times (16 - 11 BCE), the Egyptian Empire covered the general area of the current country and up north where Israel, Jordan and Lebanon are generally located. Later, they were part of the Greek and Ottoman empires.
over your mom
Cyrus the Great's rule differed from earlier empires through his approach to governance and cultural tolerance. Unlike many conquerors who imposed their culture and beliefs, Cyrus respected the customs and religions of the peoples he conquered, allowing them to maintain their traditions. This policy of tolerance helped to unify his diverse empire and foster loyalty among his subjects. Additionally, Cyrus established a more organized administrative system, promoting infrastructure and trade, which contributed to the stability and prosperity of the Persian Empire.
Not at all - he followed the model of the predecessor empires he took over - Assyrian and Babylonian.
babetrsdsgfdg
Rhodesia. That was when it was under English rule.
empires; kingdoms; dominions; domains; realms;
Your question can be asking for two answers. If you mean what are empires, well, they are a group of territories ruled by one central government and law. If you mean who are emperors, they are the ones who rule an empire.
Byzantium and Russia were different empires with many rulers in their long existence as empires.In Byzantium the emperor was called Autocrat and in the late Russian empire it was called Czar or Tsar.
Ceylon, during the British rule.
So Europeans could rule more countries and states.
the roman empire the the byzantine empire then bye ottoman rule
He used the same techniques of retaining local government with provincial governors appointed by him. It's just that he had a much vaster area to control.