By leaving local government in the hand of reliable local despots, establishing twenty Persian provincial governors to control them, and enciuraging prosperity to keep the people happy. As well, they provided external security to protect from intruders trying to move in.
Persia was able to unify its empire through a combination of effective administrative practices, military prowess, and cultural tolerance. The Achaemenid Empire, for instance, implemented a sophisticated system of satrapies (provinces) governed by local rulers who were loyal to the Persian king, allowing for efficient governance over vast territories. Additionally, the Persians respected the customs and religions of conquered peoples, fostering loyalty and reducing resistance. This blend of strong centralized authority and cultural inclusivity enabled Persia to maintain control over a diverse and expansive empire.
Persia's ability to organize a massive empire compared to Greece stemmed from its centralized administration, efficient communication systems, and a diverse, tolerant approach to governance. The Persian Empire utilized satrapies, or provincial governors, to maintain control over vast territories while allowing local customs and laws to persist. In contrast, Greece was fragmented into independent city-states with frequent conflicts and a lack of unified governance, which limited its capacity for large-scale organization. Additionally, Persia's infrastructure, such as the Royal Road, facilitated trade and communication, further strengthening its imperial cohesion.
Athens lost its empire. Sparta gained temporary ascendancy until defeated by Thebes 30 years later. Greece was devastated and weakened. Persia, defeated nearly a century earlier, was able to dictate a peace. Macedonia was able to exert hegemony over Greece, and defeat Persia.
They had lots of security to look out for the
Persia was able to organize a massive empire compared to Greece due to its centralized administrative structure and effective communication systems, such as the Royal Road, which facilitated trade and governance across vast distances. Additionally, Persia employed a policy of tolerance and respect for local customs and religions, allowing for smoother integration of diverse cultures. In contrast, Greece was fragmented into city-states with independent governments, which often focused on their own interests rather than unifying efforts. This lack of central authority and cohesion hindered Greece's ability to form a large, cohesive empire.
He defeated Persia and took over its empire for himself.
persia
There was no Greek empire. Greece was a series of city-states.
When Aurangzeb died then his successors were not able to maintain a large empire.
Genghis khan was the one to unify them all. He ruled entire Eurasia.
Alexander the Great was able to maintain his empire by spreading Greek language and culture. He understood that the best way to stabilize his vast empire was to maintain a certain level of homogenization.
Persia's ability to organize a massive empire compared to Greece stemmed from its centralized administration, efficient communication systems, and a diverse, tolerant approach to governance. The Persian Empire utilized satrapies, or provincial governors, to maintain control over vast territories while allowing local customs and laws to persist. In contrast, Greece was fragmented into independent city-states with frequent conflicts and a lack of unified governance, which limited its capacity for large-scale organization. Additionally, Persia's infrastructure, such as the Royal Road, facilitated trade and communication, further strengthening its imperial cohesion.
The Spartan alliance took money from Persia and was able to afford a fleet which could match that of the Athenian empire.
Athens lost its empire. Sparta gained temporary ascendancy until defeated by Thebes 30 years later. Greece was devastated and weakened. Persia, defeated nearly a century earlier, was able to dictate a peace. Macedonia was able to exert hegemony over Greece, and defeat Persia.
They had lots of security to look out for the
They were able to repel the Eurasian peoples who flooded into Europe, defend their borders, and maintain a prosperous society.
Persia was able to organize a massive empire compared to Greece due to its centralized administrative structure and effective communication systems, such as the Royal Road, which facilitated trade and governance across vast distances. Additionally, Persia employed a policy of tolerance and respect for local customs and religions, allowing for smoother integration of diverse cultures. In contrast, Greece was fragmented into city-states with independent governments, which often focused on their own interests rather than unifying efforts. This lack of central authority and cohesion hindered Greece's ability to form a large, cohesive empire.