answersLogoWhite

0

Roman form of Government

Updated: 4/28/2022
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Best Answer

The Romans had three forms of government, the monarchy, the republic and the principate.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Roman form of Government
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which Roman Empire died in 44 BC?

There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.There was no Roman emperor in 44 BC. Rome was ruled by the republican form of government at that time.


Which contribution of ancient roman culture was the development of?

the republican form of government


One contribution of ancient Roman culture was development of?

The Republican form of government


What form of government was a legacy of the roman empire?

Bug


What form of government was retained by the roman people?

a republic


What are ancient Roman emperors?

Ancient Roman emperors were the men who governed the Roman empire under the principate form of government. They were the ultimate authority even though they had advisers and the senate to assist them.Ancient Roman emperors were the men who governed the Roman empire under the principate form of government. They were the ultimate authority even though they had advisers and the senate to assist them.Ancient Roman emperors were the men who governed the Roman empire under the principate form of government. They were the ultimate authority even though they had advisers and the senate to assist them.Ancient Roman emperors were the men who governed the Roman empire under the principate form of government. They were the ultimate authority even though they had advisers and the senate to assist them.Ancient Roman emperors were the men who governed the Roman empire under the principate form of government. They were the ultimate authority even though they had advisers and the senate to assist them.Ancient Roman emperors were the men who governed the Roman empire under the principate form of government. They were the ultimate authority even though they had advisers and the senate to assist them.Ancient Roman emperors were the men who governed the Roman empire under the principate form of government. They were the ultimate authority even though they had advisers and the senate to assist them.Ancient Roman emperors were the men who governed the Roman empire under the principate form of government. They were the ultimate authority even though they had advisers and the senate to assist them.Ancient Roman emperors were the men who governed the Roman empire under the principate form of government. They were the ultimate authority even though they had advisers and the senate to assist them.


What describes the government of the roman republic?

Their form of government has influenced the democratic governments of today.


What is the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman Emperor?

The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.


What does Eusebius's believe is the best form of government in the roman empire?

Monarchy. :)


One contribution of roman culture was the development of?

The Republican form of government


What part of the US federal government is roman?

No part of the United States government is Roman. We have our own unique system of government. Although some concepts of our government may be loosely based on Roman concepts, our system of government is incomparable to any ancient form of rule.


What are the differences between the Roman republic and the Roman civilization?

The Roman civilization has to do with their culture and way of living. The republic was a form of government.The Roman civilization has to do with their culture and way of living. The republic was a form of government.The Roman civilization has to do with their culture and way of living. The republic was a form of government.The Roman civilization has to do with their culture and way of living. The republic was a form of government.The Roman civilization has to do with their culture and way of living. The republic was a form of government.The Roman civilization has to do with their culture and way of living. The republic was a form of government.The Roman civilization has to do with their culture and way of living. The republic was a form of government.The Roman civilization has to do with their culture and way of living. The republic was a form of government.The Roman civilization has to do with their culture and way of living. The republic was a form of government.