No, but she had power and she definitely used it!
She had her bad points, and her good ones.
No Cleopatra was not an evil pharaoh.
No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.
yes.. she was good
No.
No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.
No Cleopatra was not an evil pharaoh.
No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.No, not really, although she had been depicted as evil by the Romans and many later writers. The Romans, in particular Octavian, had good reason to depict her as evil. However, in reality, Cleopatra only did what she thought was best for herself and her country by using the only resources she had, which were money and her personality.
cleopatra is evil and people think black cats are evil and plus dogs are mans best freind and cats are womans best freind
his love for evil Cleopatra
Cleopatra was an expert scientist and mathematician
There is no such thing as "good evil." Evil is the opposite of good.
yes.. she was good
No.
Cleopatra led the Egyptian civilization.
No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.No, a good ruler does not lose his/her kingdom. Cleopatra lost it all and her people lost their independence.
Cleopatra never got a medical degree. She was never a doctor.
Women didn't attend school in the times of Cleopatra.