0
An erroneous presumption by many historians with regards to Crassus' social caste is that he was a plebeian when historical evidence is conclusive in showing that he was a patrician. The conclusive evidence that Crassus was a patrician can be derived by his service as consul with Pompey The Great in 70 and 55 B.C. as well as Pompey's third consulship with Metellus Scipio. The laws of the consulship required that one candidate be a patrician and another a plebeian and nothing indicates that any exceptions were ever made to that rule. Patrician lineage had to originate from the earliest days of Rome such as with Caesar claiming that the Iuli clan originated from Aeneas' son Iulius. Pompey was from Picenum which was a comparatively new region to have received the Latin rights granted by Rome; also, his father served as a tribune. The Licinii clan was an Etruscan one which originated as a patrician clan during the earliest days of Rome when it was a monarchy. Since only plebeians could serve as tribunes, Pompey was certainly one as well. In comparison, there is no evidence that any members of Crassus' immediate family ever served in the tribunate. As for Pompey's third consulship in 52 B.C., it was shared with Metellus Scipio who as unquestionably a patrician meaning that Pompey had to be of plebeian rank. All of the facts therefore indicate that Crassus was a patrician and not a plebeian.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoGaius Cassius was a plebian ( also known as pleb)
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Was Marc Antony a plebeian or a patrician?
The Antonii were a plebeian family, so therefore Marc Antony was a plebeian. But don't be misled by the connotation. By the time of the late republic, the plebs were quite wealthy and a force in Roman politics.
What is the nobility in roman society?
The Roman nobility were known as the Patrician class and came originally from the oldest Roman families.The nobility in ancient Roman society were called the patricians and the plebeians. Yes, it's well known that the plebeian were the poor and the disenfranchised, but that was only at the beginning of the republic. Over the years the plebs gained their rights and status and wealth and were considered the aristocrats along with the patricians because they were one of the two groups who could trace their ancestry back to the founding of the city. In addition, one of the consuls had to be a plebeian from about the last quarter of the republic.
What Led to the conflict of the Orders?
Patricians were allowed to stand for election to political office, but over time these laws were revoked, and eventually all offices were opened to the Plebeians. Since most individuals who were elected to political office were given membership in the Roman Senate, this development helped to transform the senate from a body of Patricians into a body of Plebeian and Patrician aristocrats. This development occurred at the same time that the Plebeian legislative assembly, the Plebeian Council, was acquiring additional power. At first, its acts ("plebiscites") applied only to Plebeians, although after 449 BC, these acts began to apply to both Plebeians and Patricians. It wasn't until 287 BC, however, that the Patrician senators lost their last check over the Plebeian Council. However, the Patricio-Plebeian aristocracy in the senate still retained other means by which to control the Plebeian Council, in particular the closeness between the Plebeian Tribunes and the senators. While this conflict would end in 287 BC with the Plebeians having acquired political equality with the Patricians, the plight of the average Plebeian had not changed. A small number of aristocratic Plebeian families had emerged, and most Plebeian politicians came from one of these families. answer from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_the_Orders Patricians were allowed to stand for election to political office, but over time these laws were revoked, and eventually all offices were opened to the Plebeians. Since most individuals who were elected to political office were given membership in the Roman Senate, this development helped to transform the senate from a body of Patricians into a body of Plebeian and Patrician aristocrats. This development occurred at the same time that the Plebeian legislative assembly, the Plebeian Council, was acquiring additional power. At first, its acts ("plebiscites") applied only to Plebeians, although after 449 BC, these acts began to apply to both Plebeians and Patricians. It wasn't until 287 BC, however, that the Patrician senators lost their last check over the Plebeian Council. However, the Patricio-Plebeian aristocracy in the senate still retained other means by which to control the Plebeian Council, in particular the closeness between the Plebeian Tribunes and the senators. While this conflict would end in 287 BC with the Plebeians having acquired political equality with the Patricians, the plight of the average Plebeian had not changed. A small number of aristocratic Plebeian families had emerged, and most Plebeian politicians came from one of these families. answer from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_the_Orders
Who were the members of the first trumvirate?
The members of the first triumvirate were Crassus, Pompey and Caesar.The members of the first triumvirate were Crassus, Pompey and Caesar.The members of the first triumvirate were Crassus, Pompey and Caesar.The members of the first triumvirate were Crassus, Pompey and Caesar.The members of the first triumvirate were Crassus, Pompey and Caesar.The members of the first triumvirate were Crassus, Pompey and Caesar.The members of the first triumvirate were Crassus, Pompey and Caesar.The members of the first triumvirate were Crassus, Pompey and Caesar.The members of the first triumvirate were Crassus, Pompey and Caesar.
How do you use patrician in a sentence?
Her high patrician cheekbones were her most striking feature.
Was Caesar a patrician or plebeian?
patrician
Was Trajan a plebeian or patrician?
the emperor Trajan was a patrician. Although his family had been plebeian, the emperor Vespasian made his father a patrician.
How defeated the patrician plebian?
No one defeated the patrician plebeian. There was not such a thing as a patrician plebeian. The patricians and the plebeians were two distinct social groups. The former were the aristocracy and the latter were the commoners.
Who were citizens of Rome?
the patrician and plebeian syeda
What were both patrician and plebeian men?
classes
Who were Rome's citizens?
the patrician and plebeian syeda
Julius Caesar was plebians or a patrician.?
Plebeian
What is an plebeian in the Roman Empire?
A person who was not a patrician.
Was Julius Caesar a patrician or plebeian?
a partrican
Can the Patricians and Plebeians move up or down the social ladder?
Yes they could. Some patrician clans became plebeian over time. Some patrician clans became extinct. Some patrician men had themselves adopted by plebeian families so as to give up their patrician status because they wanted to become plebeian tribunes. Some plebeian notables were elevated to patrician status by emperors during the period of rule by emperors.
What group of people did the Romans belong to?
The social group of most Roman citizens was the proletariat. These were people who where citizens but were neither patrician, plebeian or equite.The social group of most Roman citizens was the proletariat. These were people who where citizens but were neither patrician, plebeian or equite.The social group of most Roman citizens was the proletariat. These were people who where citizens but were neither patrician, plebeian or equite.The social group of most Roman citizens was the proletariat. These were people who where citizens but were neither patrician, plebeian or equite.The social group of most Roman citizens was the proletariat. These were people who where citizens but were neither patrician, plebeian or equite.The social group of most Roman citizens was the proletariat. These were people who where citizens but were neither patrician, plebeian or equite.The social group of most Roman citizens was the proletariat. These were people who where citizens but were neither patrician, plebeian or equite.The social group of most Roman citizens was the proletariat. These were people who where citizens but were neither patrician, plebeian or equite.The social group of most Roman citizens was the proletariat. These were people who where citizens but were neither patrician, plebeian or equite.
Who are better patrician or plebeian?
The patricians were the upper classes.
