That would depend on whether you believe King Arthur actually existed. His place in "history" is that of a legend, and if he did exist, he was King of only a small area of England.
it was bad
yes
he was a terrible king
In the legend of King Arthur, the primary antagonists include characters like Mordred, who betrays Arthur, and Morgan le Fay, who embodies treachery and dark magic. Mordred's ambition and desire for power lead him to rebel against Arthur, ultimately resulting in a tragic conflict. Morgan le Fay, often depicted as Arthur’s half-sister, uses her magical abilities for manipulation and vengeance against Arthur and Camelot. Their actions disrupt the ideals of chivalry and honor that Arthur and his knights strive to uphold.
Hades did not do anything 'bad', he was the king of the Underworld and it's deities were dark if not deadly by nature. The only myth that centers him as a 'villain' is that of Persephone's kidnapping.
a bad king
it was bad
It is about mordreds mother Morgan(a) singing her son who she had with her half brother, king Arthur. And it's about how king Arthur is bad and Mordred deserves to be king with his birth-rights
yes
Good King Bad was created on 8-07-09.
he was a terrible king
no Keith whyte was the best kings
what are the bad things king james the 1st did
He was good because he was a king. He was bad because he raped a lot of sexy women, mostly fingering their vaginas.
He was no king at all, but emperor.
Henry was made king after his father died, but the real question is was he a good king or a bad king?
Henry V was a good king because he beat the french in the battle of Agincourt, he was a good military leader and he delt with rebels. He was a bad king because as a young man he spent most of his time in pubs and brothels