yes
Persians were way bigger than. Greek soldier and had better tools
The Spartans were ultimately weaker than the Romans due to their rigid social structure and reliance on a small population of elite warriors, which limited their military and economic flexibility. While Sparta excelled in land warfare and maintained a strong military tradition, Rome's more adaptable and inclusive approach to governance allowed it to integrate diverse cultures and resources from conquered territories. Additionally, Rome's innovations in military tactics, engineering, and logistics contributed to its ability to maintain a vast and powerful empire. Ultimately, the Romans' capacity for expansion and adaptation outpaced Spartan strengths.
Because they were from Sparta.
If the helots defeated the Spartans, the Spartans, being defeated, could not do anything to them.
Ares, being a son of Zeus, didn't have his own realm (i.e. sky, underworld, ocean). He did have places that were sacred to him, and the Spartans, Myrmidons and Romans revered him most of all.
The Spartans did not lose anything to the Romans.
Spartans
I think the answer would be yes
No, two different cultures.
Spartans had a better armty
To defend themselves from the Spartans, Romans, and Persians.
The bronze age was better than the steel age because they had better weapons better sheilds and better warriors like the Spartans
The Spartans never needed walls. Their men were its own walls. The Spartans were fierce fighters. They were the most powerful infantry in the world before the Romans came.
YES
Because the Romans had better tactics,better army,better equipment than the Celts(British). This means they won lots of battles.
there were the Persians and the Romans and some ancient Greece left at that time
The Romans Like The Spartans.... Or maybe the pikes, im not sure tho.