Oh, dude, the Incas were like a mixed bag of trail mix. They did some cool stuff with their engineering and agriculture, but they also did some not-so-cool stuff with their conquests and sacrifices. So, were they benevolent rulers or cruel conquerors? Like, both? Can't really put a label on it, man.
They were cruel, and unfair. Sparta was a terrible place that believed only in war and fighting.(that is where we get the word spar from.)
To answer your question correctly, you must first remember that we have to judge the ancient rulers by their own standards and not by ours. There was no such thing as a "kind" ruler in the ancient world. The "good emperors/kings" would not hesitate to slit an opponent's throat if they thought he presented a danger. Cleopatra was neither kind nor cruel, but some of her actions, especially the killing of her brother and sister, are positively cruel to us.
I would like to know if Egyptians had cruel puishment and if they did what are them?
Since the Greek gods were personifications of natural phenomena and based on human nature, all of them had the capacity to be cruel. Some were worse than others, but all of them, at some point, did something we would consider cruel.
This is a description which can be described as propaganda. An examination of all the armies of the ancient world would attact the description 'brutal and cruel'. Similarly an examination of al the armies of the mediaeval world would attact the description 'brutal and cruel'. Similarly an examination of al the armies of the modern world would attact the description 'brutal and cruel' is you wanted to denigrate any of them to suit a particular agenda. War is 'brutal and cruel'.
He wanted to bring order to society, so that the rulers would be role models. Confucius thought it was important because he wanted them not to be cruel. Rulers had developed a propensity of being cruel to slaves and other classes.
He wanted to bring order to society, so that the rulers would be role models. Confucius thought it was important because he wanted them not to be cruel. Rulers had developed a propensity of being cruel to slaves and other classes.
He wanted to bring order to society, so that the rulers would be role models. Confucius thought it was important because he wanted them not to be cruel. Rulers had developed a propensity of being cruel to slaves and other classes.
He wanted to bring order to society, so that the rulers would be role models. Confucius thought it was important because he wanted them not to be cruel. Rulers had developed a propensity of being cruel to slaves and other classes.
They hated them because they were cruel pepple
The Romans were very cruel rulers as they showed no mercy. They enjoyed watching gladiators fighting and early Christians were thrown to the lions, because of their beliefs.
they both ran an empire they were both rulers and cruel
No, with very few exceptions under despotic, cruel rulers.
Misery can change a person's behavior by causing them to become bitter and resentful, leading them to act in ways that are harmful or cruel.
They were cruel, and unfair. Sparta was a terrible place that believed only in war and fighting.(that is where we get the word spar from.)
"Tyranny" is a word usually associated with cruel, despotic, corrupt rulers. For the most part, ancient Egyptian rulers were not this way; Egypt was a monarchy. Some even consider it an absolute monarchy. But it was definitely NOT a "tyranny".
that very hour the cruel law was ibolished, and custom drifted into as far a past that only the the legend remains.