He took over the Persian Empire. He didn't destroy it as he wanted it in good condition for himself.
The Aztecs did in fact have an empire. This empire was actually a very famous empire back in the day.
Apparently Alexander the Great conquered it and gave it to the local King Porus.Another view:That is the conundrum. The Persian Empire had ceased to exist by then and Darius had been murdered by his own princes. Alexander was in fact attacking King Porus to strip him of the northern Indus Valley. He allegedly defeated Porus and amazingly gave it back to him and threw in the added gift of the kingdom of his own loyal ally King Taxiles who had helped him defeat Porus. This is a befuddled story which suggests that Alexander didn't defeat Porus or conquer the Indus Valley.
That it was such a disparate empire that to control it required constant military effort. Alexander spent the next five years suppressing revolt in the eastern provinces, and left them in some disarray in his retreat to Babylon, when he chose the coastal route rather than fighting his way back through today's Afghanistan.
governor
you all are wrong and suck go back to high school
It didn't. It brought the South back into the Republic.
His soldiers simply refused to go any further. Alexander did not turn back to Greece by the way. He went back to Babylon which he wanted to establish as the new capital of his Empire. It was there that he died.
No. Ancient Greece never had an empire. An empire is a vast territory ruled by one city. Ancient Greece was never united. It consisted of individual city-states with their own laws and customs. The only time they would unite was in times of crises. When the trouble was over it was back to their independent cities. The closest thing to an empire that could even remotely be considered Greek was the conquests of Alexander the Great. However this quickly fell apart at Alexander's death.No. Ancient Greece never had an empire. An empire is a vast territory ruled by one city. Ancient Greece was never united. It consisted of individual city-states with their own laws and customs. The only time they would unite was in times of crises. When the trouble was over it was back to their independent cities. The closest thing to an empire that could even remotely be considered Greek was the conquests of Alexander the Great. However this quickly fell apart at Alexander's death.No. Ancient Greece never had an empire. An empire is a vast territory ruled by one city. Ancient Greece was never united. It consisted of individual city-states with their own laws and customs. The only time they would unite was in times of crises. When the trouble was over it was back to their independent cities. The closest thing to an empire that could even remotely be considered Greek was the conquests of Alexander the Great. However this quickly fell apart at Alexander's death.No. Ancient Greece never had an empire. An empire is a vast territory ruled by one city. Ancient Greece was never united. It consisted of individual city-states with their own laws and customs. The only time they would unite was in times of crises. When the trouble was over it was back to their independent cities. The closest thing to an empire that could even remotely be considered Greek was the conquests of Alexander the Great. However this quickly fell apart at Alexander's death.No. Ancient Greece never had an empire. An empire is a vast territory ruled by one city. Ancient Greece was never united. It consisted of individual city-states with their own laws and customs. The only time they would unite was in times of crises. When the trouble was over it was back to their independent cities. The closest thing to an empire that could even remotely be considered Greek was the conquests of Alexander the Great. However this quickly fell apart at Alexander's death.No. Ancient Greece never had an empire. An empire is a vast territory ruled by one city. Ancient Greece was never united. It consisted of individual city-states with their own laws and customs. The only time they would unite was in times of crises. When the trouble was over it was back to their independent cities. The closest thing to an empire that could even remotely be considered Greek was the conquests of Alexander the Great. However this quickly fell apart at Alexander's death.No. Ancient Greece never had an empire. An empire is a vast territory ruled by one city. Ancient Greece was never united. It consisted of individual city-states with their own laws and customs. The only time they would unite was in times of crises. When the trouble was over it was back to their independent cities. The closest thing to an empire that could even remotely be considered Greek was the conquests of Alexander the Great. However this quickly fell apart at Alexander's death.No. Ancient Greece never had an empire. An empire is a vast territory ruled by one city. Ancient Greece was never united. It consisted of individual city-states with their own laws and customs. The only time they would unite was in times of crises. When the trouble was over it was back to their independent cities. The closest thing to an empire that could even remotely be considered Greek was the conquests of Alexander the Great. However this quickly fell apart at Alexander's death.No. Ancient Greece never had an empire. An empire is a vast territory ruled by one city. Ancient Greece was never united. It consisted of individual city-states with their own laws and customs. The only time they would unite was in times of crises. When the trouble was over it was back to their independent cities. The closest thing to an empire that could even remotely be considered Greek was the conquests of Alexander the Great. However this quickly fell apart at Alexander's death.
The dissatisfaction of his troops. He had several near mutinies because his men wanted to get back home as they had been away for so long.
Ernst Emil Alexander Back was born in 1881.
Ernst Emil Alexander Back died in 1959.
When Alexander the Great led his army into the Indus Valley, he encountered strong resistance from local kingdoms, most notably the battle against King Porus at the Hydaspes River in 326 BCE. Despite the fierce opposition, Alexander emerged victorious, showcasing his military prowess and expanding his empire into the Indian subcontinent. This campaign marked the easternmost reach of Alexander's conquests, leading to cultural exchanges between Greek and Indian civilizations. However, the harsh conditions and the desire of his troops to return home ultimately forced Alexander to turn back, ending his ambitions in India.
Alexander the Great had to give up his campaign primarily due to the exhaustion and mutiny of his troops, who were weary after years of continuous warfare and far from home. After reaching the Indus River, his soldiers expressed a strong desire to return to their families, fearing further military engagements. Additionally, the challenges of managing a vast empire and the logistical difficulties of moving further into India contributed to his decision to turn back. Ultimately, Alexander recognized the limits of his army's endurance and chose to prioritize their well-being.
When is Boardwalk Empire coming back on HBO
When is Boardwalk Empire coming back on HBO
The Empire Strikes Back was directed by Irvin Kershner
Alexander the Great's conquests took him as far east as the regions of present-day Pakistan and parts of India. He famously fought the Battle of the Hydaspes in 326 BCE against King Porus, which is located near the Jhelum River in modern-day Punjab. His campaign extended through the Persian Empire and into the Indian subcontinent, marking the furthest reach of his military endeavors before his troops ultimately refused to march further east. After this, Alexander turned back, heading toward Babylon, where he later died.