montezumaII
The Aztec rulers were known as the Mexica
there are records of 11 Aztec rulers. All I know of are Moctezuma Ahuitzotyol Moctezuma II
hard
there were tons of Aztec rulers so you can't really tell but i can give you a suggestion of where you should go to find out, you should go to Google and type Ancient Aztec Rulers. and you can find so many rulers and all that junk.
A unique characteristic of Aztec rulers was their dual role as both political leaders and religious figures. They were seen as intermediaries between the gods and the people, often performing elaborate rituals to ensure the favor of the deities. Additionally, Aztec rulers were expected to demonstrate military prowess and expand the empire, which was integral to their legitimacy and authority. This combination of spiritual, political, and military responsibilities set them apart from many other contemporary rulers.
The Aztec rulers were known as the Mexica
there are records of 11 Aztec rulers. All I know of are Moctezuma Ahuitzotyol Moctezuma II
The Aztec ruler had great structures built, similar to the Egyptian rulers. They also made laws and headed the military of the civilization.
hard
Montezuma I and montezuma II
there were tons of Aztec rulers so you can't really tell but i can give you a suggestion of where you should go to find out, you should go to Google and type Ancient Aztec Rulers. and you can find so many rulers and all that junk.
A unique characteristic of Aztec rulers was their dual role as both political leaders and religious figures. They were seen as intermediaries between the gods and the people, often performing elaborate rituals to ensure the favor of the deities. Additionally, Aztec rulers were expected to demonstrate military prowess and expand the empire, which was integral to their legitimacy and authority. This combination of spiritual, political, and military responsibilities set them apart from many other contemporary rulers.
There was only one Aztec city, the rest of the cities from the empire kept their rulers so therefore, they weren't Aztec cities, they only were under their influence and had to pay tribute.
The Aztec victory in battle often resulted in the expansion of their empire, increased territory, and the acquisition of resources and tribute from conquered regions. Victorious battles also enhanced the status and power of the Aztec rulers and military leaders, reinforcing their dominance in Mesoamerica. Furthermore, these victories contributed to the practice of capturing prisoners for ritual sacrifice, which was integral to Aztec religious beliefs and societal structure.
There are no rulers in an anarchic society.
Because the Aztecs didn't set up their own rulers in the conquered territories. They allowed the old government to stay in power as long as they payed tribute and were loyal to the Aztec emperor. Without an Aztec in power in the conquered city states, some of them could rise against the Aztecs, as they did when the empire fell to the hands of the Spanish conquistadors
That's easy. They never conquered him. He conquered them.