Thucydides only described events that happened during his own lifetime, specifically the Pellopenesian War. His works are important because he was the first to pursue a 'scientific' approach, carefully researching source material, basing motives on the hard facts around them, and not bothering with any assumed interference of any gods. Because he wrote about his own lifetime, he had the luxury of being able to fairly easily verify his facts and to talk with surviving witnesses.
Herodotus wrote about history, the events that had happened before his own lifetime. He is called 'the first modern historian' because he also tried to base his stories on facts instead of on myths. But his facts were much more difficult to verify as there were often no surviving witnesses and archeology was a thing of the far future. So he had to verify 'facts' by comparing the stories about them and deciding whether they were plausible or not. Often he told his readers that he considered something 'true' because several spokesmen told him the same story; or he told his readers that - and why - he thought a story implausible, or he invited them to judge for themselves.
The difference between the two's work is that one experienced the war and then wrote about it while the other just wrote about it not being present.
Early historians often used information from unverifable sources.
Reading critically the works of early historians like Herodotus and Thucydides is essential because their writings reflect the biases, cultural contexts, and methodologies of their time, which can influence historical interpretation. By analyzing their accounts, we gain insight into how history was constructed and the political or social agendas at play. This critical approach helps us distinguish between fact and interpretation, allowing a more nuanced understanding of historical events and their significance. Additionally, it fosters a greater awareness of the evolution of historiography and the importance of source evaluation in historical scholarship.
Reading critically the works of early historians like Herodotus and Thucydides is essential because they shaped the foundations of historical methodology and narrative. Their accounts reflect not only historical events but also the biases, cultural contexts, and limitations of their time. By analyzing their work critically, we gain insights into how history is constructed and the complexities of interpreting past events. This understanding helps us to recognize the influence of perspective and context in historical writing, fostering a more nuanced appreciation of history.
It because herodotus copied most of the works of hecateus and since Herodotus was the father of history then it makes hecateus the grandfather
Unlike Herodotus, Thucydides saw war and politics as the activities of human beings- NOT gods
The difference between the two's work is that one experienced the war and then wrote about it while the other just wrote about it not being present.
The difference between the two's work is that one experienced the war and then wrote about it while the other just wrote about it not being present.
Early historians often used information from unverifable sources.
Herodos composed The Histories on the origins and events in Greek origins and establishment leading up to the Persian Wars, as a series of paid lectures he delivered in Athens as a money-spinner, later amalgamated into a book. Although he attempted accuracy to avoid criticism, they also had to be a good story. Thucydides' aim was a strictly accurate record of the Peloponnesian War with a lead up of its origins. Herodotus was a good story teller, Thucydides was a sacked general setting the record straight.
Early historians often used information from unverifable sources.
Early historians often used information from unverifable sources.
Early historians often used information from unverifable sources.
Reading critically the works of early historians like Herodotus and Thucydides is essential because their writings reflect the biases, cultural contexts, and methodologies of their time, which can influence historical interpretation. By analyzing their accounts, we gain insight into how history was constructed and the political or social agendas at play. This critical approach helps us distinguish between fact and interpretation, allowing a more nuanced understanding of historical events and their significance. Additionally, it fosters a greater awareness of the evolution of historiography and the importance of source evaluation in historical scholarship.
Yes, Herodotus refers to Stonehedge in his works. It can be read up on in the book from Stonehenge to Samarkand where he discusses his discoveries while venturing to these exotic historical architecture.
Herodotus was an ancient Greek historian. Because of his works he has been honored in the modern world as the "Father of History". He lived from 485 BC BCE to 425 BC BCE. He is most famous for his histories of wars between the Greeks and the Persians.
It because herodotus copied most of the works of hecateus and since Herodotus was the father of history then it makes hecateus the grandfather