0
Thucydides only described events that happened during his own lifetime, specifically the Pellopenesian War. His works are important because he was the first to pursue a 'scientific' approach, carefully researching source material, basing motives on the hard facts around them, and not bothering with any assumed interference of any gods. Because he wrote about his own lifetime, he had the luxury of being able to fairly easily verify his facts and to talk with surviving witnesses.
Herodotus wrote about history, the events that had happened before his own lifetime. He is called 'the first modern historian' because he also tried to base his stories on facts instead of on myths. But his facts were much more difficult to verify as there were often no surviving witnesses and archeology was a thing of the far future. So he had to verify 'facts' by comparing the stories about them and deciding whether they were plausible or not. Often he told his readers that he considered something 'true' because several spokesmen told him the same story; or he told his readers that - and why - he thought a story implausible, or he invited them to judge for themselves.
What else can I help you with?
What is different about the works of Herodotus's and Thucydides?
The difference between the two's work is that one experienced the war and then wrote about it while the other just wrote about it not being present.
How were Greek historian Thucydides differed from Herodotus?
Herodotus was widely traveled and wrote about everything. Thucydides wrote only about the Peloponnesian War.
How are the works of Herodotus and Thucydides different?
Herodotus, often called the "Father of History," focused on storytelling and the cultural narratives of events, blending historical facts with mythology and personal anecdotes. In contrast, Thucydides adopted a more analytical and critical approach, emphasizing empirical evidence and a rigorous examination of political and military events, particularly in his account of the Peloponnesian War. While Herodotus sought to entertain and inform through a broad narrative, Thucydides aimed to provide a precise and objective account, prioritizing accuracy over narrative flair. This distinction highlights Herodotus's more anecdotal style versus Thucydides's emphasis on cause and effect in history.
Why is it important to read critically the works of early historians such as Herodotus or Thucydides's?
Early historians often used information from unverifable sources.
Herodotus and Thucydides wrote that are still read today?
histories
What is the different about the works of herodotus and thucydides?
Unlike Herodotus, Thucydides saw war and politics as the activities of human beings- NOT gods
Who were the two founders of Greek historical writing?
The two founders of Greek historical writing were Herodotus and Thucydides. While they had different styles, they attempted to be truthful and forthright.
What is different about the works of Herodotus's and Thucydides?
The difference between the two's work is that one experienced the war and then wrote about it while the other just wrote about it not being present.
What different about the works of Herodotus and Thucydides?
The difference between the two's work is that one experienced the war and then wrote about it while the other just wrote about it not being present.
How were Greek historian Thucydides differed from Herodotus?
Herodotus was widely traveled and wrote about everything. Thucydides wrote only about the Peloponnesian War.
Why is it to read critically the works of early historians such as herodotus or thucydides?
Early historians often used information from unverifable sources.
How are the works of Herodotus and Thucydides different?
Herodotus, often called the "Father of History," focused on storytelling and the cultural narratives of events, blending historical facts with mythology and personal anecdotes. In contrast, Thucydides adopted a more analytical and critical approach, emphasizing empirical evidence and a rigorous examination of political and military events, particularly in his account of the Peloponnesian War. While Herodotus sought to entertain and inform through a broad narrative, Thucydides aimed to provide a precise and objective account, prioritizing accuracy over narrative flair. This distinction highlights Herodotus's more anecdotal style versus Thucydides's emphasis on cause and effect in history.
Which of the following Greek historians examined his sources critically and excluded those that were unreliable A Herodotus B Homer C Thucydides D Zenophon?
Thucydides
Why is it important to read critically the works of early historians such as Herodotus or Thucydides's?
Early historians often used information from unverifable sources.
Why is important to read critically the works of early historians such as herodotus or thucydides?
Early historians often used information from unverifable sources.
Why is it important to critically read works of early historians such as Herodotus or Thucydides?
Early historians often used information from unverifable sources.
What did Herodotus and Thucydides establish as a field of study?
History
