answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.

The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.

The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.

The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.

The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.

The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.

The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.

The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.

The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

The first Roman emperor, Octavian, accepted the title, Augustus, which was given to him by the senate.

The first Roman emperor, Octavian, accepted the title, Augustus, which was given to him by the senate.

The first Roman emperor, Octavian, accepted the title, Augustus, which was given to him by the senate.

The first Roman emperor, Octavian, accepted the title, Augustus, which was given to him by the senate.

The first Roman emperor, Octavian, accepted the title, Augustus, which was given to him by the senate.

The first Roman emperor, Octavian, accepted the title, Augustus, which was given to him by the senate.

The first Roman emperor, Octavian, accepted the title, Augustus, which was given to him by the senate.

The first Roman emperor, Octavian, accepted the title, Augustus, which was given to him by the senate.

The first Roman emperor, Octavian, accepted the title, Augustus, which was given to him by the senate.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

The first emperor of Rome added his adoptive name to his given name. He was Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus. He was given the title "Augustus" by the senate and that's what he is popularly called, even though "Augustus" is a title, not a name.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

The first Roman emperor, Octavian, accepted the title, Augustus, which was given to him by the senate.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What name did the first emperor of Rome take?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Ancient History

Who is the last king of rome?

The last king of Rome was the famous Julius Caesar who they named the seventh month July for.Because his nephew and his adopted son in law,the next ruler of Rome was Augustus Caesar who they named the eighth month for was the first Emperor of Rome.While,the last Emperor was Lucius Cornelius who was six-years at the time.In Latin, the language use of the Romans the word Emperor means princeps with a hard c.This latin word for emperor (princeps) is where we get our word prince.


Did St. Peter die in Rome?

Indeed, he was executed in Rome, under Nero. For more of the details available to us, please see the web site:The Death of St. Peter Martyr The Church has reverenced St. Peter's tomb since the first century. When Christianity became legal, one of the first things they did was to build a church over his tomb. That Church has disintegrated, and a new one has been built there. It is called St. Peter's Basilica, and you can go there right now, take a plane to Rome, a taxi to the Vatican, and take the stairway down under the main altar. In the Crypt, you can peer through a bulletproof glass at the actual tomb of St. Peter, which is exactly where they buried him in Romeafter his execution there.


Why did civil wars occur in the Rome during the first century?

Rome was facing a rebellion in Asia Minor that required Rome intervention. The people wanted Marius to lead the war but the senate chose Sulla, who had become a consul. As a result Sulla marched on Rome and declared Marius an outlaw. Marius left to Africa, and Sulla went to the east to deal with the rebellion. As soon as Sulla left for Asia, Marius and his supporters went to take control of Rome once again. Marius died in 86 BCE but his followers continued the battle to take control of Rome. In 82 B.C.E., on his way back from the east, Sulla marched in yet again with his army and the first civil war broke out. Hope this helps!


Who was the emperor after Nero?

Caligula was the next emperor, but he became mentally ill shortly afterward and was an even worse emperor than Tiberius. However, since he generally limited his excesses and atrocities to the higher families of Rome and provided great entertainment to the people, he was actually well liked by the plebeians


Why did Cleopatra join an alliance with rome?

Cleopatra joined in an alliance with Rome in order to try to preserve Egypt's independence. She ruled a wealthy country which was surrounded by Roman territories and allies. She knew that at any time Rome could walk in and take over Egypt and there would be nothing she could do about it. To add to her apprehension, one of her ancestors actually willed Egypt to Rome, but Rome declined to accept. An alliance was the one way to preserve her country's independence and her dynasty.Cleopatra joined in an alliance with Rome in order to try to preserve Egypt's independence. She ruled a wealthy country which was surrounded by Roman territories and allies. She knew that at any time Rome could walk in and take over Egypt and there would be nothing she could do about it. To add to her apprehension, one of her ancestors actually willed Egypt to Rome, but Rome declined to accept. An alliance was the one way to preserve her country's independence and her dynasty.Cleopatra joined in an alliance with Rome in order to try to preserve Egypt's independence. She ruled a wealthy country which was surrounded by Roman territories and allies. She knew that at any time Rome could walk in and take over Egypt and there would be nothing she could do about it. To add to her apprehension, one of her ancestors actually willed Egypt to Rome, but Rome declined to accept. An alliance was the one way to preserve her country's independence and her dynasty.Cleopatra joined in an alliance with Rome in order to try to preserve Egypt's independence. She ruled a wealthy country which was surrounded by Roman territories and allies. She knew that at any time Rome could walk in and take over Egypt and there would be nothing she could do about it. To add to her apprehension, one of her ancestors actually willed Egypt to Rome, but Rome declined to accept. An alliance was the one way to preserve her country's independence and her dynasty.Cleopatra joined in an alliance with Rome in order to try to preserve Egypt's independence. She ruled a wealthy country which was surrounded by Roman territories and allies. She knew that at any time Rome could walk in and take over Egypt and there would be nothing she could do about it. To add to her apprehension, one of her ancestors actually willed Egypt to Rome, but Rome declined to accept. An alliance was the one way to preserve her country's independence and her dynasty.Cleopatra joined in an alliance with Rome in order to try to preserve Egypt's independence. She ruled a wealthy country which was surrounded by Roman territories and allies. She knew that at any time Rome could walk in and take over Egypt and there would be nothing she could do about it. To add to her apprehension, one of her ancestors actually willed Egypt to Rome, but Rome declined to accept. An alliance was the one way to preserve her country's independence and her dynasty.Cleopatra joined in an alliance with Rome in order to try to preserve Egypt's independence. She ruled a wealthy country which was surrounded by Roman territories and allies. She knew that at any time Rome could walk in and take over Egypt and there would be nothing she could do about it. To add to her apprehension, one of her ancestors actually willed Egypt to Rome, but Rome declined to accept. An alliance was the one way to preserve her country's independence and her dynasty.Cleopatra joined in an alliance with Rome in order to try to preserve Egypt's independence. She ruled a wealthy country which was surrounded by Roman territories and allies. She knew that at any time Rome could walk in and take over Egypt and there would be nothing she could do about it. To add to her apprehension, one of her ancestors actually willed Egypt to Rome, but Rome declined to accept. An alliance was the one way to preserve her country's independence and her dynasty.Cleopatra joined in an alliance with Rome in order to try to preserve Egypt's independence. She ruled a wealthy country which was surrounded by Roman territories and allies. She knew that at any time Rome could walk in and take over Egypt and there would be nothing she could do about it. To add to her apprehension, one of her ancestors actually willed Egypt to Rome, but Rome declined to accept. An alliance was the one way to preserve her country's independence and her dynasty.

Related questions

What steps did emperor aurelian take to protect rome?

He built a wall around Rome


How many horses did Hadrian take to conquer Rome?

Hadrian never conquered Rome. He became emperor because he was designated emperor by Trajan who ruled before him.


Caesar a title or name?

Caesar may have looked as though it were a surname but in fact it was a title such as emperor or king. However, it didn't start out like that. It was the surname of the Emperor Augustus, the first Roman emperor. Although later Roman emperors had different surnames, the name Caesar was always associated with the emperorship and continued to be so long after its connection with the Julius Caesar family ended.


What steps did emperor aurelian had to take because of the threats from invaders?

He built a wall around Rome


Which steps did the invaders forced emperor aurelian take?

He had to build a wall around Rome for increased defence


Who is Ruler of Rome who first took the title imperator?

Many Victorious Roman Generals throughout the history of Rome were named "imperator" by their Soldiers on the field of battle, it was a requirement for tge general to be voted a Triumph by the Senate. Augustus was the first to take it as part of his name or title...thus the English title EMPEROR. As a side note, Augustus is also a title that Gauis Julius Caesar Octavianus added to his name. Hope this was useful..


How did the Romans choose emperors?

First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.First of all, bear in mind that the Romans did not choose their emperors-- it was not an elected office. Ideally, an emperor would name someone as his heir in his will and that person would become the new emperor once the old one died (or was killed). However in reality, many emperors did not have valid wills or were assassinated. In cases such a these, the man who had the strongest backing would take the throne. The senate would give its rubber stamp approval and Rome would have a new emperor--at least until the next round of intrigue.


What steps did Aurelian take when increased threats from invaders?

He divided the empire in half so that it would be easier to defend


Where did the first serious slave revolt take place?

Rome


Who was the first ruler to take title holy Roman Emperor?

Julius ceasar


Who is the last king of rome?

The last king of Rome was the famous Julius Caesar who they named the seventh month July for.Because his nephew and his adopted son in law,the next ruler of Rome was Augustus Caesar who they named the eighth month for was the first Emperor of Rome.While,the last Emperor was Lucius Cornelius who was six-years at the time.In Latin, the language use of the Romans the word Emperor means princeps with a hard c.This latin word for emperor (princeps) is where we get our word prince.


When did the first Roman Emperor take power?

Officially it was 30 BC after the Battle of Actium.