0
What were the causes and effects of the division of the roman empire into two parts?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
The division of the Empire by the Emperor Diocletian; a man with a supurb gift for organization, at first resulted in two manageable empires ruled by two separate emperors. Diocletian also alobished the traditional legion as a unit in the Roman Army, eliminating the problem of Roman generals becoming Emperor by force of arms. And Diocletian broke with another tradition by retiring rather than ruling for life.
Unfortunately, Diocletian ruled from Constantinople, the new capital founded by his predecessor Constantine, while the Emperor of the West ruled from Rome. As time went by, the East remained strong while the West was once again plagued with economic failure, governmental ineptitude, barbarian invasions (illegal immigrants of their day), and ambititious generals competing for power. Rome became indefensible, and the capital of the West was moved to Ravenna. The two Roman Empires became divided by differences in culture. The West dwindled while the East prospered, and the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire outlived the West by centuries. The division preserved the Roman ideal of Imperium in the short run, but in the long run its effects are debatable.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoStudents sometimes wrongly think that the empire was split by emperor Diocletian when he created an eastern and a western part of the Roman Empire with two respective imperial capitals, Nicomedia and Milan. This was not the case. What Diocletian created were new administrative arrangements and a co-emperorship (with one senior emperor in the east and one in the east system and two junior emperors in charge of troubled frontier areas in each of the two parts of the empire) for a single Roman Empire which, he stressed, was indivisible.
Historians consider the eastern and western parts of the Roman Empire to have become split after the death of Theodosius I, the last sole emperor, in 395. The split was due to circumstances, not to an imperial decision. Theodosius gave the western part to his son Honorius, and the eastern part of his other son Arcadius. This in itself was nothing new. There had been many periods with co-emperors. The empire became split for two reasons. One was that the co-emperors were young and inexperienced and powerful politicians in the east and the west took advantage of this to conspire against each other. There was also a plot in the west to seize some of the land of the east. The other reason is that the Germanic invasions of the western part of the empire begun soon afterwards, in 406. These invasions were the beginning of the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire.
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoHistorians see the death of Theodosius in 395 as the point at which the eastern and western parts of the Roman Empire split. This was not due to an imperial decision to do so. It was a loss of unity. It happened because the two sons of Theodosius, whom he designated as co-emperors (Arcadius in the east and Honorius in the west) were young, inexperienced and incompetent. Powerful politicians in the east and the west took advantage of this to conspire against each other. There was also a plot in the west to seize some of the land of the east. This was one of two major factors in this development. The other one was the Germanic invasions of the western part of the Roman Empire which begun 11 years later. The western part started to crumble under the weight of these invasions and eventually fell.
This part of the empire lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. There were shadow emperors who were powerful men who installed puppet emperors and were the effective rulers. One of them was Ricimer, a Germanic who was commander in chief of the western Roman army and installed three emperors (Majorian, Libius Severus and Olybrius). His nephew, Gundobad, installed Glycerius, but did not hold the strings of power as he had to return to his native Burgundy to deal with feuds there. Orestes installed his 15-year old son, Romulus Augustus, who was the last emperor of the west. One emperor, Avitus, was proclaimed emperor by Theodoric II, the king of the Visigoths.
Some emperors of the east interfered with politics in the west. One was Leo I the Thracian, who in 467 proclaimed Anthemius (an eastern Roman military commander) emperor of the west because he wanted the two parts of the empire to join forces to fight the Vandals who were attacking southern Italy and southern Greece for their base in northwest Africa. He sent Anthemius to Italy with an army and wanted him to gather troops in the west. In 474 the emperor Leo I rejected the proclamation of Glycerius as emperor of the west by the army of the west. He proclaimed his nephew-in-law, Julius Nepos (Nepos means nephew) emperor of the west and sent him to Italy to depose Glycerius who surrendered without fighting. In 487 the emperor of the east Zeno sent his ally, Theodoric the Great, king of the Ostrogoths (who had been allowed to settle in the eastern part of the empire) to invade Italy to depose a usurper there. In theory, Theodoric was meant to be like a viceroy of Zeno. In reality he became the ruler of Italy.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agothe battle of Francisco Pizarro and the Inca's
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What effect did Diocletian had on roman history?
The Emperor Diocletian was the one who created the Tetrarchy. The Tetrarchy was the division of the Roman Empire into four parts, with a co-emperors ruling over each quarter. Diocletian also oversaw the last period of persecution against Christians in the Roman Empire.
How did the Inca empire communicate with different parts of their empire?
they used messaging across the partd of the inca around there
How did the Inca Empire start?
The Inca empire was first created in the 1200's when two siblings got married. They started the empire and made it into 4 separate parts.
How did Persia's roads help improve the Empire's organization?
The roads connected various parts of the Empire making it faster and easier to deliver messages to the various parts, important in a pre-mechanical transport and electronic era.
What countries did Incas live in?
The Inca empire was centred in Cuzco in what is now Peru. Their empire is believed to have extended into parts of modern-day Colombia and Chile.
Why did The emperor Diocletian divide the Roman Empire into and eastern and western empire?
Diocletian did not divide the Roman Empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.
What was the lasting result of the Diocletian division of the Roman empire?
Diocletian's successors continued his policy of State control of the empire's economy. His division of the empire into two parts helped set up the long existence of the Byzantine empire in the East. In the long run however, Diocletian's reforms, slowed down, but could not prevent the western half of the empire to survive.
Why did the Roman Empire divide into the east and west?
The Empire had become too large to control in a pre-mechanical transport and pre-electronic communications age. He split it into four parts, the two larger - east and west - ruled by their own emperor, the two lesser ones by a caesar. This gave each ruler a manageable area to control.
Who split the roman empire into two parts in ad 330?
Constantine split the Roman Empire into the Holy Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire. It should be noted however that the emperor Diocletian (284-305 AD ) made this easier as he was the first to divide the empire into two parts, a western and eastern empire to be ruled separately. The emperors who followed Constantine, Julian and Theodosius I, made permanent the division of the Roman Empire into an eastern and western half.
What is a bisection?
A bisection is a division or the process of division into two parts, especially two equal parts.
Name the parts of the cell that are copied during cell division?
the parts of the cell which are copied during cell division are chromosomes.
What does division word mean?
Division means to divide or cut into parts or pieces.Division means to divide or cut into parts or pieces.
What parts of the former Roman Empire did the Byzantine Empire control?
The Eastern Empire.
What operation do you use when you find parts of parts Math?
You use division.
What are the parts of a division problem?
the parts of division problem are : dividend , divisor , quotient and remainder . where : dividend = quotient * divisor + remainder
What emperor toured the roman empire during his rein?
Many emperors toured the empire, or many parts of it, but Hadrian is the one noted for his traveling.Many emperors toured the empire, or many parts of it, but Hadrian is the one noted for his traveling.Many emperors toured the empire, or many parts of it, but Hadrian is the one noted for his traveling.Many emperors toured the empire, or many parts of it, but Hadrian is the one noted for his traveling.Many emperors toured the empire, or many parts of it, but Hadrian is the one noted for his traveling.Many emperors toured the empire, or many parts of it, but Hadrian is the one noted for his traveling.Many emperors toured the empire, or many parts of it, but Hadrian is the one noted for his traveling.Many emperors toured the empire, or many parts of it, but Hadrian is the one noted for his traveling.Many emperors toured the empire, or many parts of it, but Hadrian is the one noted for his traveling.
Would you use a classification paragraph or a division paragraph to explain the parts of a computer?
Division
