The comma should be placed after "in fact" to clarify the sentence. The corrected sentence would read: "Trumpets, in fact, are at least 3,500 years old." This placement emphasizes the phrase "in fact" as an aside and improves the overall readability.
The answer would be... remarkable team of travelers.
I wanted to see the ancient part of sparta, so i traveled to the pelopennesus.
Your ancestors would be very proud. Several of my ancestors are buried in this cemetery.
In the sentence "Egypt was conquered by Persia, which was conquered by Alexander the Great," the adjective clause "which was conquered by Alexander the Great" is non-essential. It provides additional information about Persia but is not crucial to understanding the main point of the sentence, which is that Egypt was conquered by Persia. Removing the clause would still leave a complete and coherent sentence.
Here's an example of how it would be used:"The fans venerate the celebrity."Vnerate is, more or less, regard with feelings of respect and reverence.=OI hope I answered your question right and well enough.
Not always. Here is one where there is no need: At least he was happy. Here is one using a comma: She knew at least, that she would make it home.
Yes, there should be a comma after "told" in a sentence such as "He told me, that he would be late." This comma is used to separate the introductory clause from the main clause and improve clarity in the sentence.
What sentence If u r talking about the question u would say where is the place of comma in this sentence, than give the sentence
There is not rule that says you must use a comma before the word you exclusively. You would have to use a comma if the sentence would require one. Now if you were writing down the slang of 'you are' you would write it like this; you're. There must have been a sentence example for your homework assignment and your teacher wanted to know if you needed to use a comma in that sentence. Here is an example of the correct usage of the comma. I celebrate Easter, you don't, but I do every year.
no . Additional: 'Which' sometimes has a comma before it, but it depends on the sentence. I find it hard to imagine a situation when 'which' would have a comma after it.
Yes, a comma is needed in the sentence. The correct way to write it would be "Yale is in New Haven, Connecticut." The comma is used to separate the city (New Haven) from the state (Connecticut) in the sentence.
You can identify a comma splice in a sentence by looking for two independent clauses that are incorrectly joined together with just a comma. This error can be corrected by replacing the comma with a semicolon, period, or coordinating conjunction.
It depends on whether the statement is a complete sentence or not. If the quoted statement is a complete sentence, you would use a period. If the quoted statement is within a larger sentence, you would use a comma.
If a sentence consists of two independent clauses with a comma between them, it is a comma splice. That is, the part before the comma can stand on its own as a sentence, and the part after the comma can also stand on its own as a sentence, then it is a comma splice. If there is no punctuation there instead of a comma, it is known as a run-on sentence.
Yes, a comma is not needed after "wood" in this sentence. It is already clear that "wood" is the subject being discussed, and inserting a comma may disrupt the flow of the sentence.
the comma would be before Or In A Sentencee. =]
The "comma"is before the word"but"because if you had a sentence that your teacher wants you to write,that sentence would be called a"compound sentence".A compound sentence is a sentence that have the words"but"and"and".(example.I want that dog ,but I changed my mind.)