Ramses 2
Actually Cleopatra had very few achievements as a ruler. If it were not for her involvement in Roman politics, she would have faded into history as just another nondescript Egyptian ruler. The one big thing she did achieve was additional territories under her control due to her alliance with Marc Antony.
The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.
Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).
No there is not a forgotten ruler named Senkhara!
Cleopatra.
hatshepsut because
Queen Hatshepsut was the first woman ruler known to history.
Asoka
Actually Cleopatra had very few achievements as a ruler. If it were not for her involvement in Roman politics, she would have faded into history as just another nondescript Egyptian ruler. The one big thing she did achieve was additional territories under her control due to her alliance with Marc Antony.
Asoka was the greatest ruler in Ancient India. He conversion to buddhism. He used the Buddhism ideals to guide his rule. He also set up hospital for both human (both poor and rich) and animals.
Actually Cleopatra had very few achievements as a ruler. If it were not for her involvement in Roman politics, she would have faded into history as just another nondescript Egyptian ruler. The one big thing she did achieve was additional territories under her control due to her alliance with Marc Antony.
A egept ruler is called a Pharaoh
The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.The uraeus was the symbol of an Egyptian ruler. It was the Egyptian crown. As queen, Cleopatra would be entitled to wear it.
An Egyptian ruler is the pharaoh, he was their king then and he sure was treated like one! orAn Egyptian ruler is someone who rules Egypt!by: snorkie1234 age:11 from: Elkton MD
Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).
Np, Saint Athanasius was never an Egyptian ruler.
It is a part of the history of Greek and Roman literature.