One statement that is not true about Egypt's influence on Kush is that Kush was completely reliant on Egypt for its culture and governance. While Egypt certainly had a significant impact on Kushite society, including trade, religion, and art, the Kingdom of Kush maintained its own distinct identity and governance, often asserting independence and even conquering Egypt at certain points in history.
I am sorry but we can't answer because we don't have the statements you were given.
A. Farming is done by peasants called fellaheen.B. Almost all farmland is on the Nile River Delta.C. Farmers use modern agricultural methods.D. The soil of the Nile River Delta is extremely fertile.
The majority of the Biblical land of Cush was found in the area of modern day Sudan. Some of the kingdom did stretch into what is now Egypt.
True - the 330s.
True
I am sorry but we can't answer because we don't have the statements you were given.
It is true that Kush was invaded by Rome,
Kush was conquered by Askum.
Kush was conquered by Askum.
Kush was conquered by Askum.
False
it is false
Kush was conquered by Askum.
Yes, This Is True
Three of those statements are true: (2) Kush controlled all of Egypt at one point - 25th Pharaonic Dynasty AND (4) Rome invaded Kush (unsuccessfully) - Rome tried to conquer Kush around 22 B.C.E. and had Petronius lead the attack. However, the Kushites were able to defeat this invasion and established peaceful relations with Rome afterward AND (5) Kush was conquered by Aksum. (1), and (3) are false. Since the Aksumites conquered Kush, it could not have been the Greeks. Since Kush was in Sudan and Egypt, it was not in Saudi Arabia.
Yes egypt did because Kush became more richer. Yes, when Egypt began to get weaker, its empire contracted, giving Kush independence. Eventually, Kush turned right around and conquered Egypt.
The statement is false . Part of Kush was located in what is currently known as southern Egypt. It was also located in what is now Sudan.