Priscus was a Roman diplomat and historian known for his account of the events surrounding the Gothic War in the late 5th century, particularly his interactions with the Huns. His description is often considered reliable because he was an eyewitness to many events and provided detailed observations of the cultures and practices of the groups he encountered. However, like any historical account, his writings may reflect his biases and the context of his time, which can affect the reliability of his observations.
Reliable? Hmm. Peter knew the most about Jesus but was not reliable. I'd say that Paul was the most reliable witness.
Seven kings of Rome, the succession of seven kings who according to tradition ruled Rome before the founding of the republic: Romulus (founder of the city), Numa Pompilius, Tullus Hostilius, Ancus Martius, Tarquinius Priscus, Servius Tullius, and Tarquinius Superbus. Answers.com
According to me I will say,yes the epic of Homer are probably a reliable source of information about history of the ancient Greeks because we get hints about life during this period from two great epic poems, the Iliad( the greatest source of information about the Trojan War) and Odysseus, reveal much about the values of the ancient Greeks.
Basing historical accounts on reliable evidence
foolhardy
Priscus - general - died in 613.
Ceratodacus priscus was created in 2000.
Priscus was a Murmillo Verus was a Provacatore
Herodes Atticus died in 177.
hes not reliable
he was a roman ambassador to the huns
Tarquinius Priscus.
According to one website, the Latin word for "antique" is "priscus." Priscus means antique, ancient, former, old days, etc.
Ancient or old-fashioned.
This differs on opinion but I think that it is the good description of a character that makes it believable.
There are many of cars that can be reliable. It all depends on the person and what they think is reliable.
Tarquinuis priscus he was the fifth Etruscan ruler