answersLogoWhite

0

In times of crisis, it was thought that one person could unite and coordinate the (usually) military steps that had to be taken to solve the problem. By giving one person supreme authority, there would be no one to veto his proposals and no pesky politicians to limit the army's actions.

In addition, a dictator was immune from prosecution for any of his actions as dictator - which meant he could take extreme measures without fearing legal consequences.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Ancient History

Was the roman dictator a good idea?

The Roman dictator was a practical solution during times of crisis, allowing for swift decision-making and centralized authority. However, the concentration of power often led to abuses and the potential for tyranny, as seen with figures like Julius Caesar. While the role could be effective in managing emergencies, it ultimately contributed to political instability and the decline of the Roman Republic. Thus, the concept had both merits and significant drawbacks.


What is the Greek origin of the word dictator?

It doesnt have a greek origin, its the latin word dictator. A dictator in ancient rome was a judge temporarily invested with absolute power.


What was cincinnatus most famous for?

In 458 BC. there was a threat to the Romans after the Aequi tribe attacked Rome. The Romans decided to appoint a dictator, Cincinnatus. Cincinnatus was in power for 16 days and left after the Aequi tribe was defeated.The Roman values he shows are pietas, loyalty, humility, self-sacrifice to state.Cincinnati, Ohio is named after him.George Washington is considered the "modern day" Cincinnatus.


Who were the roman slaves called?

The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.The Romans called their slaves by their names.


How did the Romans with the Scots?

how did the romans cope with the scots

Related Questions

What could the Romans do appoint in times of emergencys?

Under the republic, the Romans could appoint a dictator in times of emergencies.


When was the consul allowed to choose a dictator?

A dictator was elected for 6 months and they were only elected during emergencies of the State.


What is an absolute ruler that Romans appointed to deal with a crisis?

dictator


What branch of government in ancient rome that had unlimited power called a dictator?

The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.


Why were many Romans willing to accept a dictator?

Twenty years of civil war meant many Romans were willing to accept a dictator


Why were so many Romans willing to accept a dictator?

Twenty years of civil war meant many Romans were willing to accept a dictator


Who was elected dictator for life by the Romans?

Julius Caesar


Who was Fabius' Master of the Horse?

Fabius was dictator appointed by the Roman Senate. He did not choose his own Master of the Horse, but instead had an enemy named Marcus Minucius appointed by the Romans.


When did the Romans appoint a director and for how long?

I think you mean Dictator. The Romans would appoint a dictator only in times of crisis and when the problem was solved, the Dictator was expected to step down from his office. However, five years was usually the maximum amount of time. that the senate would give out to a Dictator. Julius Caesar was the exception.


When did the early Romans appoint dictators?

The first dictator was appointed in 490BC


What did the Romans might have felt about living in a dictatorship?

The Romans never lived in a dictatorship. The word dictator had a different meaning for the Romans. He was an extraordinary officer of state appointed for a term of six months during an emergency.


How old would you have to be to be a Roman soldier?

The Romans preferred men to be between 20 and 22 years old as at that age a man had gained his adult size. However in emergencies they would take people younger.The Romans preferred men to be between 20 and 22 years old as at that age a man had gained his adult size. However in emergencies they would take people younger.The Romans preferred men to be between 20 and 22 years old as at that age a man had gained his adult size. However in emergencies they would take people younger.The Romans preferred men to be between 20 and 22 years old as at that age a man had gained his adult size. However in emergencies they would take people younger.The Romans preferred men to be between 20 and 22 years old as at that age a man had gained his adult size. However in emergencies they would take people younger.The Romans preferred men to be between 20 and 22 years old as at that age a man had gained his adult size. However in emergencies they would take people younger.The Romans preferred men to be between 20 and 22 years old as at that age a man had gained his adult size. However in emergencies they would take people younger.The Romans preferred men to be between 20 and 22 years old as at that age a man had gained his adult size. However in emergencies they would take people younger.The Romans preferred men to be between 20 and 22 years old as at that age a man had gained his adult size. However in emergencies they would take people younger.