The farmers farmed the land, the priests ran the religion, the pharaohs ruled assisted by the nobility, the wormen bore and raised children and worked on the farms, and the slaves worked for them all.
kiss my butt whats your answer
The Aztec class system was rigid primarily due to its hierarchical structure, which was deeply rooted in cultural beliefs and social norms. Society was divided into distinct classes, including nobles, priests, commoners, and slaves, with each class having specific roles and responsibilities. This rigidity was enforced by the Aztec religion, which emphasized the divine right of the ruling class and the importance of social order. Additionally, economic control and land ownership further solidified class distinctions, limiting social mobility for most individuals.
In ancient times, the simple Varna system had degenerated into a rigid caste system. The high-caste Hindus developed hatred for the low-caste people, most of whom were branded as the Shudras or the Untouchables who were subjected to abject humiliation, suffering and misery. They were even not allowed to draw water from the public wells or to visit temples.
The caste system in India has its origins in ancient Hindu society, primarily detailed in texts like the Rigveda, which categorized people based on their occupations and roles in society. Initially, it was a flexible system with four main varnas: Brahmins (priests), Kshatriyas (warriors), Vaishyas (traders), and Shudras (laborers). Over time, these categories became more rigid and complex, evolving into the hereditary caste system we recognize today, influenced by social, economic, and political factors throughout history. The system has been challenged and reformed, especially in modern times, but continues to impact Indian society.
The varnas system in ancient India developed as a socio-economic classification that categorized society into four main groups: Brahmins (priests and scholars), Kshatriyas (warriors and rulers), Vaishyas (merchants and landowners), and Shudras (laborers and service providers). Its origins can be traced back to the Vedic texts, where it was initially based on occupational roles and duties, rather than rigid social hierarchies. Over time, the system became more stratified and hereditary, leading to the complex caste system seen in later Indian society. This evolution was influenced by factors such as economic changes, invasions, and the consolidation of power among different groups.
kiss my butt whats your answer
It is because of the Nile River, they that it was a God. ;) lol jk What I meant was that the pharaoh kept it stable.
Sparta was a city-state in ancient Greece. One of the things it's well-known for is its rigid social structure. The main religion practiced in Sparta was Greek Polytheism.
Egypt today has no rigid social structure. However, there is certainly an entitled wealthy class and the lower class of working poor which predominates in most developing nations, for which Egypt is no exception.
During the postclassical era in India, the caste system was primarily a rigid social system. It was characterized by strict social hierarchy and limited social mobility based on birth. This rigid structure was reinforced by religious beliefs and societal norms.
Each social division is called a caste.
Ancient Egypt had three main social classes--upper, middle, and lower. The upper class consisted of the royal family, rich landowners, government officials, important priests and army officers, and doctors. ... Ancient Egypt's class system was not rigid. People in the lower or middle class could move to a higher position.
It is because of the Nile River, they that it was a God. ;) lol jk What I meant was that the pharaoh kept it stable.
caste
cast
This is a statement. A statement can't be answered.
The Aryans used a system called varna to determine social class. Your social class was determined by birth, with four main varnas: Brahmins (priests and scholars), Kshatriyas (warriors and rulers), Vaishyas (farmers and merchants), and Shudras (laborers). This system was hierarchical and led to a rigid social structure in ancient Indian society.