His army was superior in their use of the phalanx and long spear.
He used bribes to neutralise some cities and divisions amongst the Greek city-states to gain allies and stop unified resistance to him.
He defeated the two main antagonists Athens and Thebes to clinch the deal.
He united the cities to support the proposed campaign against Persia.
He created a strong army, some willingly joined him, conquered some city-states and bribed others. Ended freedom of Greek city-states, defeated Persian Empire, expanded the economy, spread Greek culture, exposed Greece to Eastern culture.
This is some strange combination of names and confusion of events which has no relationship to reality. Can you turn this into a meaningful question if you want an answer.
After the Persian navy had been defeated in 480 at Salamis, the Greek cities were able to concentrate and defeat the Persian army, ending the invasion of peninsular Greece.
King Xerxes tried to carry on his father Darius I's attempt to establish an ethnic frontier by subjugating mainland Greece, as the mainland Greek states were fomenting rebellion in the Greek states in Asia which were under Persian control. He lost, and Athens established an anti-Persian league which dominated the eastern Mediterranean. Although the internal fighting in the Greek world subsequently eroded the strength of the Greek states, and Persian gold was able to buy influence in them, the rise of Macedonia, and Philip II's and then Alexander's control of Greece tipped the balance of power against Persia. Alexander took the empire's Mediterranean coastline and so removed the Persian fleet, and as on land Persia's military forces were unable to match the power of Macedonian-Greek forces, he was able to defeat them in three major battles, and so take over the Persian Empire.
Answer.com is stupid
The Spanish were able to defeat the Inca because of there new weapons and their support from Inca rivals.
By superior force, strategy and tactics.
Philip II never conquered any countries. What he did do was unite the Greek city states so that upon his death his successor Alexander the Great was able to take on and defeat the Persian army and ultimately the entire empire.
Phillip II defeated the Greeks at the Battle of Chaeronea in 338 BCE.
The Peloponnesian War and the subsequent ongoing wars between the city states led by Sparta and Thebes had exhausted the Greek city-states. Sparta's remaining military force was restricted to trying to maintain control of its territory. Athens had shrunk from losses to the plague and the wars. As a result Philip was able to defeat their combined forces at the battle of Chaeronaea. Also Philip bribed the lesser cities of the Amphyctionic League to push his side of arguments. The cities were reduced to accepting Philip as Hegemon (leader) of Greece. After his murder, there was an uprising, but Alexander took control and put it down and destroyed Thebes and sold its population into slavery as a warning to the other cities.
The Greek coalition offered battle on the rough ground of the foothills where the Persian cavalry could not operate effectively, and the Greek armoured infantry was able to defeat the inferior Persian unarmoured infantry.
Philip was assassinated by his personal bodyguard Pausanias of Orestis. Alexander took his place as king of the Greek kingdom of Macedonia and hegemon of a united Greece on the campaign against Persia.
This is some strange combination of names and confusion of events which has no relationship to reality. Can you turn this into a meaningful question if you want an answer.
Because aside from Achiiles, Hector was the greatest warrior in the world. Without Achilles, the Greeks would not have been able to defeat Troy, and they knew it.
He never had a Navy that could stand up to and defeat the Royal Navy.
The Leviathan Dragon is able to defeat a Coolfire dragon in the Dragon City.
he was able to defeat the Greeks because they were not united, but separated into a lot of different city states, while Philip had united his country into an efficient fighting force.-----The main reason King Philip of Macedonia was able to defeat the Greeks, because they were just finished with the fight that they had for years between the Sparta and Athens, which Sparta won. The all were very tired and weak physically and economically. King Philip of Macedonia saw the advantage and invaded Greece and conquered it as planed successfully.
After the Persian navy had been defeated in 480 at Salamis, the Greek cities were able to concentrate and defeat the Persian army, ending the invasion of peninsular Greece.