The Byzantine Emperor was viewed as God's representative on earth since the days of Constantine. One Empire, One God and One Emperor. Unlike the monarchs of the west who would submit to the papacy, the byzantine monarchs were seen as equal if not superior to the pope and the orthodox patriarch of Constantinople by their citizens and courts.
Justinian was an emperor of the Byzantine empire.
byzantine empire
The people of the Byzantine Empire were angered when Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne as the Holy Roman Emperor in 800 AD because they viewed this act as a direct challenge to their own authority and legitimacy. The Byzantine Empire, with its capital in Constantinople, considered itself the continuation of the Roman Empire and believed that the title of emperor should rightfully belong to the Byzantine ruler. Additionally, the crowning of a Western ruler by the pope symbolized a shift in power dynamics, undermining the Byzantine claim to be the center of Christendom. This event heightened tensions between the Eastern and Western branches of Christianity, contributing to the eventual schism.
A theocracy
Historically, we call people emperors of the Roman Empire if the Roman Senate endorsed them as such, or if an emperor approved by the Senate did so, making them co-emperors, and they subsequently ruled on their own. Anyone else who claimed independently to be the emperor is considered a claimant or usurper. The last known act of the Senate of the West Roman Empire took place in the year 603 AD, 197 years before Charlemagne was crowned emperor. He might be considered a legitimate Roman Emperor, if he had been accepted by Empress Irene of the Byzantine Empire, which was what remained of the Roman Empire at the time. From a certain point of view, all this is nonsense. If the Holy Roman Empire were still operating, our position on whether Charlemagne was legally Emperor of the Romans would almost certainly be different. There are links below.
The head of the Byzantine Empire was the Emperor. His title was Basileus
Justinian was a Byzantine Emperor, considered its greatest, and he brought the empire near to the former heights of the old Roman Empire.
No. Romulus Augustus was the last emperor of Rome. Justinian was an emperor of the Byzantine Empire
Justinian I, Leo III, John I Tzimisces, Basil II, Manuel I
Yes, they were Emperor and Empress of The Byzantine Empire.
There was not a Byzantine king. There was a Byzantine Emperor. The last Byzantine emperor was Constantine XI Palaiologos. He died in battle when Constantinople, the capital of the empire, fell to the Ottoman Turks.
The Byzantine Empire (the surviving, and Greek, part of the Roman Empire) was not a theocracy; it had a secular ruler, not a priest as ruler. However, the Greek Orthodox Church had a significant role in Greek society, and in matters where the Church had a considerable interest, its concerns would have been taken into account, and even guided the ruler's decision. As the Byzantine Empire shrank over its 1000 year history, the Greek Patriarch of Constantinople came to be the undisputed head of the Church in the Byzantine Empire, but he was never actual or defacto ruler of the state.
Constantine
Constantine promoted Christianity, but not in the Byzantine Empire. Constantine was emperor of Rome from 306 to 337 CE, but the Byzantine Empire came into existence in 395 CE, when Arcadius became emperor of the Eastern Empire, separating from the Western Roman Empire.
The Byzantine was very successful in the emperor I guess...
The Byzantine Empire was actually the part of the Roman Empire that Emperor Constantine still had control of - so technically it came after the Roman Empire
The Patriarch