Because there were so many more!
No the conflicts between patricians and plebeians did not lead to civil wars. The Conflict of the Orders between patricians and plebeians ended in the mid-3rd century BC. The Roman civil wars stared in the 1st century BC. The civil wars involved a conflict between the populares, a political faction which supported the cause of the poor, and the optimates, a conservative political faction which supported the interests of the aristocracy. They also involved personal rivalries.
The patricians were the aristocrats and the plebeians were the commoners.
because the patricians ruled over the plebeians and they made unfair laws and the plebeians had to work with no pay and no breaks.
The war between the patricians and the plebeians was/is called "the Conflict of the Orders"
Plebeians and Patricians had a lot in common-they both were citizens of Rome, they both had to pay taxes, and they both could vote. But there were also many differences. Here are some:Patricians:Wealthy landowning citizens of RomeMore and better social status than the PlebeiansCould hold public office in Roman governmentPlebeians:Working citizens (artisans etc.)Less social status (couldn't marry people of Patrician status)Could NOT hold public office.
The plebeians revolted because they wanted rights equal to those of the patricians.
Patricians were frightened because without plebeians patricians would be helpless if an enemy struck at rome.
the plebeians were the working class in ancient Rome and would have had its share of intelligence.
During the first plebeian rebellion of the First Plebeian Secession, the plebeian movement created its leaders, the plebeian tribunes and its assembly, the plebeian council. As the leaders of the plebeian movement, the plebeian tribunes were the spokesmen of the plebeians The were also the defenders of the plebeians They had the power to veto the actions of any officers of state which they deemed as being against the interests of he plebeians.
The Ionian Revolt.
Patricians were frightened because without plebeians patricians would be helpless if an enemy struck at rome.
The Romans government became more democratic by the revolt of the Plebeians. The Patricians' strangle hold on power was broken and the Plebeians gained rights. These rights were written, and referred to as the Laws of the Twelve Tables.
Cyrus II led a Persian revolt against the Medes. His revolt was successful. Cyrus won independence for Persia/information from
The plebeians were the commoners
Sparta's population was mostly slaves, and their economy depended on slave labor. A slave revolt would certainly be economically devastating, and there was a distinct chance that the slaves would win and overthrow the Spartan government, so obviously this was always something Sparta was worried about.
Cyrus II led a Persian revolt against the Medes. His revolt was successful. Cyrus won independence for Persia/information from
Cyrus II led a Persian revolt against the Medes. His revolt was successful. Cyrus won independence for Persia/information from