well at least i think
overpopulation
abiotic
False. The loss of a species from an ecosystem can have cascading effects on other species and the overall balance of the ecosystem. Each species plays a specific role in the ecosystem, so the loss of one can disrupt the interconnected relationships within the system.
It can cause overpopulation of a species formerly eaten by the oil covered animal, and cause animals that ate it to die due to lack of food.
When one species disappears, it can create a ripple effect throughout the ecosystem. Other species may be impacted, with some facing new competition from species that were once controlled by the extinct species. This can lead to shifts in population sizes, changes in habitat use, and altered food webs as the ecosystem tries to adapt.
If an area is having overpopulation then it is sure that they will suffer insufficient resources.Therefore,to fulfill their needs they just migrate to some place which is known to have jobs and sufficient resources.Since they migrate to other place the pevious one is free from overpopulation and hence the population is evenly distributed and balanced.
one species wins and the other isn't harmed or helped one species wins and the other isn't harmed or helped
Koalas are not endangered, and they have only recently been added to the "threatened species" list in parts of Australia. While they have all but disappeared from some regions in Australia, in other areas there is definitely an overpopulation problem. Kangaroo Island is one of these areas.
Competition coefficients measure the effect of one species on another competing species.
Symbiotic relationships can cause a population crash if one or both species become overly dependent on each other for survival. If one species experiences a decline in population, it can lead to a shortage of resources for the other species, causing a ripple effect that impacts both populations negatively and can result in a crash.
Hunting is a form of "harvesting" of certain species by other species, having a net effect of reducing the impact of one species (those killed) by increasing the impact by others. Others are of the opinion that: Hunting doesn't benefit the environment.
Predation, one animal feeds on another. parasitism one species obtains nutrients from the host, but doesn't kill it. Commensalism one benefits, the other is harmed. Mutualism two species interact and both benefits. competition neither benefit.