Defending bad processes often involves highlighting their historical context, explaining how they once served a purpose in a different environment or time. Additionally, one might argue that the processes have inherent benefits, such as stability or predictability, even if they are inefficient. It's also possible to emphasize the challenges of change, including resistance from stakeholders or the potential risks associated with transitioning to a new system. Ultimately, the focus should be on the need for gradual improvement rather than immediate overhaul.
they taste bad
they smell bad
bad lawyer job?
it is a skunk.
You are telling someone they cannot defend their life from someone bigger, younger and stronger. That is pretty bad.
No there are merely ordinary citizens with a purpose to protect the country they defend.
Domestic violence is very bad except when it's necessary to defend yourself. You should call the police first if the abuse in your family is that bad that you need to resort to violence to defend yourself. Domestic violence is wrong, except for self defence, as a last resort.
Domestic violence is very bad except when it's necessary to defend yourself. You should call the police first if the abuse in your family is that bad that you need to resort to violence to defend yourself. Domestic violence is wrong, except for self defence, as a last resort.
That is one of the premises of the US Justice system. Everyone is entitled to defense.
In a round, obtain one attack and one defend order.
The same thing you would do defending a bad review elsewhere. Defending a review is supporting it so you would add further comments in support of the review.
Because rotting processes have started to decompose the trash.