fruit is higher but sugar but sugar is less
It represent the food pyramid and the bottom organism eats less as the top organism eats more.(basically everything on the bottom)
There is typically more producers (such as plants) than anything else in an energy pyramid, as they form the base of the food chain and support higher trophic levels. Each subsequent trophic level contains less energy as it is transferred up the pyramid.
because it shows energy transfer and how there's more energy at the bottom of the pyramid with the producer and less and less energy as the consumers eat them because they burn out that energy
A pyramid of energy represents the flow of energy through different trophic levels in an ecosystem. It demonstrates the decrease in available energy as it moves up the food chain due to energy loss through metabolism and heat transfer. The pyramid shape indicates that each higher trophic level has less energy available than the one below it.
Agriculture is more efficient because in the energy pyramid they're producers while when you raise livestock they get less the energy when they eat producers. Livestock produces less food energy. Agriculture produces more because when you plant you get more of the nutrients to the vegetable or fruit. If livestock they consume the producer and get less of the energy because when the animal loses the energy it goes to the environment as heat and some energy are stored to the previous level
== == Of the trophic levels of the ecological pyramid, there are three ways to describe the flow of energy in food chains. Numbers, energy and biomass. See the related link for more information.
The energy pyramid shows how the amount of useful energy, food, decreases as organisms in that level use it. Even though a lot of energy may be taken in at any level, more energy in the form of food that is available to the next level, is stored on the bottom level and decreases at each level as you move to the top of the pyramid. Thus, there is much less energy to support organisms at the top, so there are fewer in most communities.
A food chain is more relative. A food pyramid is more empirical. The food pyramid is more useful in determining food groups and needs.
The energy pyramid is more like a food chain type. It shows one spesific path as opposed to many paths. *I have to disagree with the above. A well drawn pyramid will show many producers, first level and above consumers in an ecosystem. Therefore it is more like a food web.
A food chain shows food energy moving from organism to organism. A pyramid ofnumbers show how many organisms were involved in each level of food chain. Food chains always begin with the sun as the source of energy and the pyramid of numbers always has the producer as the base. Pyramid of numbers have more producers at the bottom than consumers at the top.The similarities are that they both are models and they both have the same organisms. They both have top consumers and they both show how energy is passed down from organism to organism.
Energy is lost as it moves up the energy pyramid due to inefficiencies in energy transfer, metabolism, and heat loss from organisms. In the biomass pyramid, energy is lost through respiration, growth, and waste production. In the numbers pyramid, energy is lost as it moves up due to population control mechanisms, such as predation and competition.
Energy decreases as you move up the energy pyramid due to energy loss at each trophic level through respiration, heat loss, and incomplete digestion. Organisms at higher trophic levels must consume more food to meet their energy needs, resulting in less energy transfer to the next trophic level.