the main arguements are exactly the arguements for the question how were humans made.It actually depends on what you believe.If you believe god made humans than its more likely humans are not animals.If you believe humans are evolved forms of cavemens etc. then its also more likely that we are animals. Im not saying you should believe what im telling you but instead saying that ther is no defenit answer sorry
"Four legs good two legs bad!"
"No taxation without representation"
This phrase indicates that what is being stated goes against or is in conflict with everything that was previously mentioned. It shows a direct disagreement or inconsistency in the information or arguments presented.
"Four legs good two legs bad!" which was bleated by the sheep but this was later changed to "Four legs good, Two legs better!"
Well some of us are. Others I'm less sure about.
The phrase means that morality is what separates humans from other animals. It means that humans have the ability to determine right from wrong and establish moral codes, but when they fail to do so they are no better than beasts.
How can the phrase "I shall dash them against the stones" be integrated into a question effectively?
"After heated discussion" is a prepositional phrase. It begins with the preposition "after" and describes a specific time or condition related to an event. The phrase suggests that something occurs subsequent to a vigorous exchange of opinions or arguments.
Though there are many 'physical and spiritual' interpretations of what this phrase means, in Genesis 1 it is clear that God is speaking about animals or the animal kind. Humans are uniquely created after the God-kind.
The phrase "philosophy is anthropocentric" means that philosophy tends to prioritize the perspective and interests of humans over other entities such as animals, plants, or ecosystems. It suggests that philosophical inquiry often revolves around human concerns and experiences at the center of its focus.
The phrase "to rise against" was used in the play Hamletby William Shakespeare. It is in the soliloquy "to be or not to be..." It was probably used as a phrase on occasion before that, but this use made it very well known.
NATO