If the population of one organism in a food web were to double, it could lead to significant ecological changes. For example, if a primary producer like grass increased in number, it might benefit herbivores that feed on it, potentially leading to their population growth as well. However, if a predator's prey doubled, it could result in overconsumption of that prey, potentially destabilizing the population balance and affecting other organisms in the web. Ultimately, the impacts would depend on the specific roles and relationships of the organisms involved.
Your question is what grammarians refer to as a double negative. To destroy a lack of necessities would be to provide necessities. If you provide an organism with necessities, it will do well.
If vital resources become more plentiful, the population size of the organism is likely to increase. The abundance of resources can support more individuals within the population, leading to improved survival and reproduction rates. This may result in a higher carrying capacity for the organism in its environment.
i don't think anything good or bag will happen to the other organism..
it would die
It would fall over..
If by organism you mean one individual, then not much unless it were in a very small food web. If you mean one species or population then whatever eats that organism would be the first and most affected by the death, but the effect would tricle through ever level of the food web.
If an organism is taken out of a foodweb then it effects the whole web.
It would cause heart attack
The allele would not be passed on to further generations, as the organism cannot reproduce. There would be a smaller population of that organism who's genetic code does not contain the allele for that particular trait.
The food chain would expand, and the new organism would have new predators.
If you mean that an organism has no genetic similarly to any other living organism, then you have a new species.
The organism would swell and then burst.