Yes they do and for good reason, humans are equally with animals, they both reach for equilibrium! ---- Good lord there's alot of these posts.
NO animals do not have rights: here's why
* 1.3 billion people worldwide depend on animals as a profitable and efficient source of food and income. Poor people or animals? * 800 million people go to bed hungry everyday, grazing animals such as cows are our only way of converting fiber into usagable energy. Hungry people or animals? * Millions of people are still deprived of their basic rights and animal rights activists wish to extend those same rights to animals. Rights for people or animals? * Trillions are invested in livestock related infostructure. * Some pharmaceuticals can only be produced (or produced in sufficient quantities) with animals. Sick people or animals? * Animals cannot understand the concept of rights as they have no morality. * Animals cannot defend their right if granted by humans. * Animals do not have the capacity to corporately maintain rights with humans. * Animals cannot follow rights themselves. * Animals cannot ask for rights or indicate a desire for them. * Countless animals everyday are slaughtered for food or fun by other animals everyday, humans are no different. * Only humans will be affected by animal rights as only humans will obey the law. * The concept of being a heartless person is relative, if i was taught dogs liked being kicked and that it was the right thing to do i would be doing it right now. * Animals rights do not benefit humans in any way, rather it harms humans. * What if an animal loved to be hurt, humans have BDSM and it can be assumed that some animals also do. How can a person decide for the animal? * If full animal rights were granted then all carnivores will have to be locked up for cannibalism. * To what extent is something considered an animal? This is a matter of opinion that only humans can decide on. * What should the rights be for an animal, they obviously are different, should there be different laws for each species? To what extent? How can we tell its the best for them? This is a matter of opinion that only humans can decide on. * I believe most hungry and poor people will shoot you first before they let you do what you want with their cattle. * People are judged on how they treat others, not animals as only other people can comment on your morality.
I'm not sure what the question is... if you asking if they exist, the answer is yes.
in Buddhism animal sacrifice does not exist. But in Hinduism animal sacrifice do exist.
There is a few animal rights but not a lot!
Homo sapiens is the only animal which has actual legal rights.
Lawrence Finsen has written: 'The animal rights movement in America' -- subject(s): Animal rights movement, History, animal rights, ethics, philosophy, Animal rights
animal rights activists
what are the aims of lush to do with animal rights
Animal Rights Party was created in 2007.
Animal Rights Cambridge was created in 1978.
Employment rights exist because employees banded together in groups called unions and pressured employers and lawmakers for more rights.
In general, the animal rights movement is a social reform movement aimed as having animals viewed as equal to humans. Animal rights advocates generally believe that animals should not be used by humans in any way (even as pets), though there are "animal rights" advocates who do not hold quite that drastic a belief. Some animal rights groups actually believe more in animal welfare than animal rights.
The concept of rights of children did not exist.