0
What else can I help you with?
Why do scientists test on animals for GM?
Animal testing is to find out how medicines work and how they help or don't help. Instead of using people for this system they use animals. Animal testing is to find out how medicines work and how they help or don't help. Instead of using people for this system they use animals.
What is an animal tester?
An animal tester is a person who engages in animal testing, the practice of using animals in scientific experimentation.
Is animal testing the same as animal dissection?
No, it is not. Animal testing is when companies and factories perform tests on animals using their products to test the results. Animal dissection is like an autopsy. It is when they open up the animal to see what is inside.
Is animal testing cruel?
No. Animal testing is a necessary part of research. Animal testing has advanced our technology and medicine. Practicaly every medical breakthrough in recent years has been due to research with animals. For example, treatments for TB, AIDS/HIV, smallpox, polio, cancer, and other devestating illnesses could only have come up (ethically) as a result of animal testing. Additionally, not only do humans benefit, but so do animals. Veterinarian treatments (i.e. treatments for animals) are largely also the result of animal testing. Research on animals has also uncovered new ways on how to treat better treat animals. Had animal testing not existed, it is very unlikely that our healthcare and well-being would be as advanced as it is today. When working with animals, scientists are expected to follow a code of ethics. Included in this code are the 3Rs: Replacement: Scientists must exhaust alternative means to get the results without testing on the animals themselves. For example, instead of testing on animals, the answers can be found from archival video clips of nature, or from computer modeling. In other words, animal testing must only done as a last resort. Reduction: If testing on animals is necessary, scientists must use as few animals as possible. Refinement: When animal testing is necessary, scientists must refine their methods taken to eliminate any unnecessary suffering caused to the subjects. For example, if an animal must be opened to view something, the animal must be anaesthized, and if it is necessary to kill the animal, it must be put down in a humane manner. Unfortunately, there are indeed occasions where some researchers inflict unnecessary cruelty on animals, such as the Silver Spring monkey case. However, to use this to brand all animal testing as cruel is like using workplace abuse cases to brand all businessness as evil. No respectable scientist is motivated by sadism or desire to cause harm to animals. Remember, scientists are just as human as any other person on earth, and sometimes they make mistakes that have consequences. This is no more flawed than a person trying to rescue and free animals, only to unknowingly and unintentionally kill them. It is lamentable that animals are subject through this, but it is a sacrifice that is necessary for the better.
What is the difference between cosmetic animal testing and medical animal testing?
NO!!!! all animal testing and is wrong! We all must stop using products that have been tested on animals. Just stop animal testing. use natural producst. Ask someone at stores where you buy your stuff were the natural/products not tested on animals! Medicine is slightly acceptable but cosmetic testing is down right wrong.
Are there any brands of makeup that still using animal testing and, if so, which are they?
Not many companies use animal testing these days, although you'll find plenty of them overseas.
How is animal testing inhumane?
There are pro's and cons to animal testing. It can help discover life saving treatments for humans and other animals. However, it is sometimes said that animal testing is inhumane because the animals are in pain, or are not taken care of. However, there are government standards on research labs. The animals do not feel pain, and even though they may die eventually, they often live as long as a normal household pet.
What did dolly teach scientists?
Dolly, the cloned sheep, taught scientists that it is possible to create an exact genetic replica of an animal using somatic cell nuclear transfer. This breakthrough in cloning technology opened new possibilities for studying genetic diseases and the potential for regenerative medicine.
How is science done by scientists?
scientists do science by using tools like microscopes and materials like animal cells or elements like hydrogen
How are antibiotics tested?
Using animal testing and also using human cells xx
Is Animism wrong?
Answer (opinion) 1 : YesAnimal testing is wrong and disgustingAnimals are often downgraded because of intelligence. They are respected as lesser beings than humans. Human babies are of lesser intelligence than human adults, but we do not test on them. We respect them. Animals have a nervous system and can feel pain, and animal's ability to feel pain, fear and sadness should be respected.__________________________________________________Answer (opinion) 2 : NoNo. Animal testing is a necessary part of research.Animal testing has advanced our technology and medicine. Practicaly every medical breakthrough in recent years has been due to research with animals. For example, treatments for TB, AIDS/HIV, smallpox, polio, cancer, and other devestating illnesses could only have come up (ethically) as a result of animal testing. Additionally, not only do humans benefit, but so do animals. Veterinarian treatments (i.e. treatments for animals) are largely also the result of animal testing. Research on animals has also uncovered new ways on how to treat better treat animals. Had animal testing not occured, it is very unlikely that our healthcare and well-being would be as advanced as it is today, and there would still be many incurable diseases.When working with animals, scientists are expected to follow a code of ethics. Included in this code are the 3Rs:Replacement: Scientists must exhaust alternative means to get the results without testing on the animals themselves. For example, instead of testing on animals, the answers can be found from archival video clips of nature, or from computer modeling. In other words, animal testing must only done as a last resort.Reduction: If testing on animals is necessary, scientists must use as few animals as possible.Refinement: When animal testing is necessary, scientists must refine their methods taken to eliminate any unnecessary suffering caused to the subjects. For example, if an animal must be opened to view something, the animal must be anaesthized, and if it is necessary to kill the animal, it must be put down in a humane manner.Unfortunately, there are indeed occasions where some researchers inflict unnecessary cruelty on animals, such as the Silver Spring monkey case. However, to use this to brand all animal testing as cruel is like using workplace abuse cases to brand all businessness as evil. No respectable scientist is motivated by sadism or desire to cause harm to animals. Rememeber, scientists are just as human as any other person on earth, and sometimes they make mistakes that have consequences.It is lamentable that animals are subject through this, but it is a sacrifice that is necessary for the better.Yes, it is WRONG! Lives of animals are on the line!
Is animal testing wrong?
Answer (opinion) 1 : YesAnimal testing is wrong and disgustingAnimals are often downgraded because of intelligence. They are respected as lesser beings than humans. Human babies are of lesser intelligence than human adults, but we do not test on them. We respect them. Animals have a nervous system and can feel pain, and animal's ability to feel pain, fear and sadness should be respected.__________________________________________________Answer (opinion) 2 : NoNo. Animal testing is a necessary part of research.Animal testing has advanced our technology and medicine. Practicaly every medical breakthrough in recent years has been due to research with animals. For example, treatments for TB, AIDS/HIV, smallpox, polio, cancer, and other devestating illnesses could only have come up (ethically) as a result of animal testing. Additionally, not only do humans benefit, but so do animals. Veterinarian treatments (i.e. treatments for animals) are largely also the result of animal testing. Research on animals has also uncovered new ways on how to treat better treat animals. Had animal testing not occured, it is very unlikely that our healthcare and well-being would be as advanced as it is today, and there would still be many incurable diseases.When working with animals, scientists are expected to follow a code of ethics. Included in this code are the 3Rs:Replacement: Scientists must exhaust alternative means to get the results without testing on the animals themselves. For example, instead of testing on animals, the answers can be found from archival video clips of nature, or from computer modeling. In other words, animal testing must only done as a last resort.Reduction: If testing on animals is necessary, scientists must use as few animals as possible.Refinement: When animal testing is necessary, scientists must refine their methods taken to eliminate any unnecessary suffering caused to the subjects. For example, if an animal must be opened to view something, the animal must be anaesthized, and if it is necessary to kill the animal, it must be put down in a humane manner.Unfortunately, there are indeed occasions where some researchers inflict unnecessary cruelty on animals, such as the Silver Spring monkey case. However, to use this to brand all animal testing as cruel is like using workplace abuse cases to brand all businessness as evil. No respectable scientist is motivated by sadism or desire to cause harm to animals. Rememeber, scientists are just as human as any other person on earth, and sometimes they make mistakes that have consequences.It is lamentable that animals are subject through this, but it is a sacrifice that is necessary for the better.Yes, it is WRONG! Lives of animals are on the line!
