put the culprits into jail for long time,it can be awareness for them.
-impose harsh penalties on the culprits -increase patrol cars in high crime areas -implement Rukun Tetangga Neighbourhood Watch -highlight failed attempts in the media
what is the philosophy that crime does not pay when an offender experiences harsh penalties
nothing
It should. Some states impose penalties if it doesn't.
If varies state to state, and some have very harsh penalties, including severe fines.
Drug courts have tended to impose stricter penalties for victimless crimes. These specialized courts focus on issues like substance abuse and often mandate treatment programs, which can include harsher consequences for non-compliance. Additionally, they aim to address the underlying issues leading to such offenses, but their approach can sometimes result in more severe penalties compared to traditional courts.
The Sherman Antitrust Act made trusts and those who violated the act subject to civil remedies and criminal penalties in actions by the Department of Justice and to treble damages in private suits.
No, a third party cannot impose a punishment on a defendant in a legal context. Only the court, as part of the judicial system, has the authority to determine guilt and impose penalties following a legal proceeding. Third parties may have roles in the process, such as witnesses or advocates, but they do not have the power to enforce punishment.
If the government is tyrannical. If they kill their own people or impose harsh laws with unfitting punishments.
by enforcement actions including bans on auditing or working for public companies; it can also ban trading in the securities of public companies.
In the 1600s, the punishment for adultery varied significantly depending on the region and legal system. In Puritan New England, for instance, adultery was considered a serious crime, often punishable by public shaming, fines, or even execution in extreme cases. In England, the Church of England might impose penalties such as excommunication, while civil courts could impose fines or imprisonment. Overall, societal attitudes toward adultery were harsh, reflecting the moral and religious values of the time.
Democrats took the view of Reconstruction that harsh penalties needed to be doled out to former Confederates while giving full rights to Freedmen.