One argument against is that it involves experimenting with the health and safety of human beings. An argument for is that although effects of drugs on animals may be similar to their effects on humans, some effects may be specific to human beings only. Another is that testing drugs on human beings may result in unexpected negative results for the subjects.
Arguments for: Testing on animals can provide valuable information on the safety and efficacy of new drugs and treatments, ultimately benefiting human health. It can also help scientists understand biological processes and diseases that can't be replicated in other models. Arguments against: Using animals for tests can be viewed as unethical due to the suffering and harm inflicted on them. There are also concerns about the reliability and relevance of animal models to human biology, leading to potential inaccuracies in research outcomes. Additionally, advancements in alternative testing methods are making animal testing less necessary.
some people think that animals have rights to but others consider them less important than humans
Everything. Without animal testing certain products, materials, and medications would have to be tested on humans. Many people don't realize that animal testing has the biggest part in the medical field. Without animal testing you would not have basic antibiotics that you get from your doctor.
Well, wouldn't yo rather have a happy, healthy life, rather than have a few happy beagles? That's the only one i can think of, although animal testing is TOTALLY wrong. Don't buy stuff tested on anything but humans.
Humans
Animal testing is useful in determining and finding new treatments for the myriad of health issues afflicting humans today. Without them, we would not have the same kind of medical and health field as we lacked 100 years ago.
Animals can die from cosmetic testing as could humans.
Neither is more important than another because animals have a different genetic makeup than humans so in the end most tests that are successful on animals are not successful on humans. For example, penicillin kills guinea pigs and has no effect on rabbits
People test on animals because if they tested on humans then we would be killing our own population, so if you breed small vermins such as mice and rats they are bread especially for testing on so it is ok. I my self am against animal testing. People test on animals because if they tested on humans then we would be killing our own population, so if you breed small vermins such as mice and rats they are bread especially for testing on so it is ok. I my self am against animal testing. To help the human population progress in health, to find cures, technically to save lives.
Absolutely not. The exploitation of creatures for painful and deadly experiments for the benefit of humans does non-humans no good. How can they benefit from new vaccines when they're dead as a result of the disease the pseudo-scientists gave them?
Because testing products on humans leading to the humans death or dysfunction would not go very well with people.