Humans have no biological need to consume the flesh or secretions of other animals. If we can live well without hurting others, why wouldn't we?
Pros: less suffering for animals, humans, and the earth.
Cons: none of any significance.
yup
Pros: provides minerals we need to make things for our everyday life Cons: It can destroy animal life
Pro: living organism model Con: violates the animal's rights inefficient and ineffective, their anatomy and biological reactions are not the same (look up the thalidomide tragedy)
Honestly, I don't think that their is any pros on animal abuse..... I'm doing a paper for school and I need pros and cons to back up my argument that animal abuse is wrong, I have tons of pros but no cons :( (so i need facts that animal abuse is right) websites would be appreciated also because I need books and websites listed for my sources and they need to be CREDIBLE resources! Thanks all help is appreciated (ill get back on soon!) :) thanks oh and HELP ME PLEASE!
what were the pros and cons for the nulification
pros an cons of the Oregon trail
gm insulin is specific to humans unlike animal insulin which is specific to that animal
pros are + and cons are-
pros: goodness cons: badness
PROS CONS ----------------------------------------------------- Pros: Entertaining Cons: Mental conditions can be caused, Adicition, Expensive.
Cons? What Cons?
what are the pros and cons of being an architect