True anecdotes for animal testing can be found in scientific journals, research articles, and ethical reviews that document the use of animals in experiments. Organizations like the American Medical Association and the National Institutes of Health often publish case studies and reports detailing specific instances of animal research. Additionally, books and documentaries addressing the ethics and outcomes of animal testing may include personal stories and firsthand accounts. Online databases and animal rights organizations may also provide narratives related to animal testing experiences.
'Testing' is used to find whether a statement is true or false.
True.
On Nickelodeon and it has already shown!
completely true it is useless people just liek to see other not being capable of leaving because they arent.... theylike to see suffer!!!1
A suggested explanation that might be true and is subject to testing by further observations is
Generally the assessment done before animal testing is performed is called the cost-benefit analysis and is done by a third party council or group of impartical examiners. the third party analyses the benefits that are believed will be found and the costs that will be done to the animal. Unfortunately the third party are obviously humans and so will not know the true costs that the animal will feel and so it is unethical for humans to decide the research can go ahead without the full knowledge of what the animal will suffer
Cosmetics companies feel that animals are not equal to us and that it is the most cost effective method. That is not true. There are more humane methods to test cosmetics and medicine.
You create a theory. Prove the theory to be true by testing it. If it works, it is true. If it does not work, it is not true.
No, an anecdote does not have to be true. An anecdote is a short and amusing or interesting story about a real incident or person, but it can also be fictional. However, presenting a false anecdote as true may undermine credibility or deceive the audience.
true
All of those statements are true. There is no exception.
For some reason this is true. We could do experiements on humans, but im sure the same people who complain that animal testing is controversial and inhumane wouldn't like that much either. Thus, we have only 2 options. Dont test things at all, and just give them to humans and hope it works how the scientist thought it would, or we don't advance science at all