Did Most Native Americans eagerly adopted European technology?

Anonymous

∙ 15y ago

Updated: 4/25/2024

Sadly yes.

Wiki User

∙ 15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Anthropology

How did humans evolve from chimpanzees?

Today, evolutionists insist that the underlying similarity of all animals, including man, and our ability to arrange and classify them into groups, is compelling evidence for their progressive evolution from a common ancestor. They insist that there is simply no other thinkable explanation for their similarities. Evolutionists argue further that the degree of similarity between any two animals attests to their degree of evolutionary "relatedness," and thus how recently they separated from a common ancestor. They are quite certain, for example, that the similarities between apes and humans prove they evolved from a common ape-like ancestor "only" 2 or 3 million years ago. Perhaps you heard the story of the evolutionist who dug up a fossilized fragment of an ape's jaw and promptly declared it to be an ancestor of man -- he was so excited about the find he said, "I wouldn't have seen it if I hadn't believed it." http://www.gennet.org/facts/metro05.html Since evolutionists generally do not believe that man evolved from any ape that is now living, they look to extinct apes in the fossil record to provide them with their desired evidence. Specifically, they look for any anatomical feature that looks "intermediate" between that of apes and man. Fossil apes having such features are declared to be ancestral to man (or at least collateral relatives) and are called hominids. Living apes, on the other hand, are not considered to be "hominids" they only sort of look like humans. Still, evolutionists are willing to accept certain trivial similarities between extinct apes and men as "proof" of ancestry. The most eagerly sought after evidence in fossil "hominids" is any anatomical feature that suggests bipedality (the ability to walk on two legs). http://www.gennet.org/facts/metro19.html The "missing links" are missing. And unfortunately, the field of paleoanthropology has been riddled with fraudulent claims of finding the missing link between humans and primates, to the extent that fragments of human skeletons have been combined with other species such as pigs and apes and passed off as legitimate. The modern theory concerning the evolution of man proposes that humans and apes derive from an apelike ancestor that lived on earth a few million years ago. The theory states that man, through a combination of environmental and genetic factors, emerged as a species to produce the variety of ethnicities seen today, while modern apes evolved on a separate evolutionary pathway. Overall, the evolution of man pervades as the accepted paradigm on the origin of man within the scientific community. This is not because it has been proven scientifically, but because alternative viewpoints bring with them metaphysical implications which go against the modern naturalistic paradigm. Nevertheless, a closer examination of the evidence reveals evolution to be increasingly less scientific and more reliant upon beliefs, not proof. http://www.allaboutscience.org/evolution-of-man.htmAnother Answer:Man did not evolve from apes but from a common ancestor that evolved not only into apes but also into man. Ken Miller, who in a court of law, helped defeat Intelligent Design teaching proposals in schools, best explains in his website at http://www.millerandlevine.com/km/evol/. Genetics proves humans and apes share a common ancestor.

Most Native Americans eagerly adopted European technology?

yes

Name three ways the Native Americans were affected by the arrival of europeans?

they traded them was one but i don't know the others. thats not the correct answer. 1.Missionaries tried to convert Indians to Christianity . 2.Indians eagerly adopted European trade goods,such as copper kettles and knives,as well as muskets and gunpowder for hunting. 3.Alcohol sold by the European traders had a harsh effect on Native American life.

What is eagerly in comparative and superlative form?

more eagerly, most eagerly

Is eagerly an adverb or verb?

Eagerly is an adverb.

What is the comparative form of eagerly?

more eagerly

What is the comparative adverb for eagerly?

more eagerly

Is most eagerly in superlative or comparative form?

Most eagerly is superlative. More eagerly is comparative.

Is eagerly a noun?

No, eagerly is a adverb, a word that describes a verb, adjective, or phrase. Examples:Verb: He eagerly jumped on the bed.Adjective: The eagerly anticipated movie opened this week.Phrase: When I said we could get ice cream they were eagerly on the move.

What is the comparative and superlative adverbs of eagerly?

What is the comparative of eagerly

Is eagerly reading a complete verb?

The word "eagerly" is a adverb.

What is the comparative and superlative adverb for eagerly?

Oh, dude, you're really making me work here, huh? So, the comparative adverb for "eagerly" is "more eagerly," and the superlative adverb is "most eagerly." Like, now you know, but was it really worth all that brainpower?

How could you use eagerly in a sentence?

The dog sat eagerly by the door.