Being a farmer meant that you had more surpluses. So you can live with more people. Therefore you are safer and have more free time. Having more free time meant that people could specialize and do the jobs that they want to do. Farmers also did not have to move as often and so they could have permanent homes and structures.
Hunter and gatherers had to move often to find food. They had less free time and had a harder job getting food.
As you can see the farming lifestyle was easier then the hunter and gatherer lifestyle.
They had to move around from place to place because they had no control over nature. They did not know anything about farming and agriculture. They hunted animals and ate their meat. They always followed their food.
Hunters and gatherers moved around to follow the availability of food sources, such as animal herds and seasonal plant growth. Moving allowed them to access fresh resources, avoid overexploiting their environment, and adapt to changing conditions, such as climate or competition with other groups.
Some of the challenges and drawbacks of being a hunter-gatherer include: Insecurity of food supply: Hunter-gatherers relied on the unpredictability of hunting and gathering, which at times resulted in periods of hunger and food scarcity. Nomadic lifestyle: Hunter-gatherer groups were often mobile, following animal herds and seasonal resources. This required constant movement and limited the establishment of permanent settlements. Lack of technological advancements: Without advanced tools and technology, tasks such as farming, building permanent structures, and food preservation were difficult or impossible to accomplish, imposing limitations on their quality of life.
The hunter-gatherers travelled from place to place in search of food. As the animals were continuously on the move,they had to keep pace with them.The same was case with fruits as only some fruits grew at some places and their non-avaibility made them travel.Hunter gatherers primarily moved from place to place in search of food or water.When they had eaten the available food in one place they would need to move on further to find more to eat. They would also follow herds of animals that they might be able to hunt.Water would have been very important for them to drink, so if their local water supply dried up they would have needed to travel to find another source.Sometimes they also moved from place to place because of the different seasonal weather conditions.
You mean nomadic. Nomads have no fixed abodes. They search for food, plant or animal, by following the seasonal abundance of edible plants and the movement of herds of wild animals. The Plains Indians of North America were largely nomadic, although the areas they roamed had limits. On the other hand Paleolithic people, although hunters and gatherers of nuts and berries, lived in fixed sites as shown by archeological finds in caves that must have been occupied by them for consecutive centuries.
They followed the herds and picked out an animal to kill.
Hunter Gatherers
Animal herds moved north, and hunter-gatherers followed.
Animal herds moved north, and hunter-gatherers followed.
Neolithic people didn'the have "towns". They were hunter gatherers and didn't stay in one place, but followed the herds for food. There is no comparison to be made.
A. Animal herds moved north, and hunter-gatherers followed.
vegetables and cattle herds
Constantly moving peoples are called nomadic. Early humans were hunters & gatherers -- they killed and ate wild game and gathered nuts/berries/other edible plants. They had to move with the animal herds and seasons that changed plant life. Only later did man learn to grow crops enabling settlements.
so they can find more animals to eat. when the animals are unable to be found, they migrate.
They were hunter/gathers following the herds for food.
Im pretty sure they are the senecas.
They followed herds and gathered food. They were nomadic.