they depended on the food they hunted and the foods nuts and berries they found to survive
Ancient hominids were hunter-gatherers; they followed the food.
No, Juliana Barr did not assert that hunter-gatherer societies had no concept of territory or boundaries. In her research, she actually highlights that hunter-gatherer societies often had well-defined territories and boundaries that they understood and respected.
Hunter-gatherer societies typically have small, nomadic populations that rely on hunting, fishing, and foraging for their food. They have a strong connection to the land and natural resources, and their social structure is usually egalitarian with limited hierarchy. They exhibit a deep knowledge of their environment and resources for survival.
Nomadic lifestyle: Hunter-gatherer societies move frequently in search of food sources, following the natural rhythms of the environment. Egalitarian social structure: These societies tend to have relatively equal distribution of resources and social status among members. Strong connection to nature: Hunter-gatherers rely on their environment for survival and often have deep spiritual beliefs tied to nature. Small communities: Typically, hunter-gatherer societies consist of small bands or tribes of closely-knit individuals who work together for the collective good.
Hunter-gatherer societies were nomadic, meaning they constantly moved in search of food, resources, and suitable environments. They had egalitarian social structures with relatively small populations where decisions were made collectively. Additionally, they had a deep connection with the natural world, relying on their knowledge of plants, animals, and landscapes for survival.
is
Ancient hominids were hunter-gatherers; they followed the food.
Characteristics of hunter-gatherer societies included the fact that they tended to be small communities and somewhat nomadic in nature.
migatory
No, Juliana Barr did not assert that hunter-gatherer societies had no concept of territory or boundaries. In her research, she actually highlights that hunter-gatherer societies often had well-defined territories and boundaries that they understood and respected.
Hunter-Gatherers did not have a food surplus
Hunter-gatherer societies had the benefit of a more varied and diverse diet, intimate knowledge of their environment, and a closer connection to nature through their lifestyle.
They were nomads. :)
Hunter-gatherer societies typically have small, nomadic populations that rely on hunting, fishing, and foraging for their food. They have a strong connection to the land and natural resources, and their social structure is usually egalitarian with limited hierarchy. They exhibit a deep knowledge of their environment and resources for survival.
Nomadic lifestyle: Hunter-gatherer societies move frequently in search of food sources, following the natural rhythms of the environment. Egalitarian social structure: These societies tend to have relatively equal distribution of resources and social status among members. Strong connection to nature: Hunter-gatherers rely on their environment for survival and often have deep spiritual beliefs tied to nature. Small communities: Typically, hunter-gatherer societies consist of small bands or tribes of closely-knit individuals who work together for the collective good.
false
Hunter-gatherer societies were nomadic, meaning they constantly moved in search of food, resources, and suitable environments. They had egalitarian social structures with relatively small populations where decisions were made collectively. Additionally, they had a deep connection with the natural world, relying on their knowledge of plants, animals, and landscapes for survival.