scopes broke the law by teaching evolution.
The Scopes Monkey Trial ended on July 21, 1925. Scopes was found guilty and ordered to pay a fine of $100. However, because of a technicality, the verdict was overturned. The official name of the trial was The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes.
Scopes was declared guilty, but people felt the law violated the Constitution. Scopes was fined and the law was upheld.
The defense team for John Scopes in the 1925 trial, also known as the Scopes Monkey Trial, included prominent lawyers Clarence Darrow and Dudley Field Malone. They argued on behalf of Scopes, who was charged with teaching evolution in a Tennessee public school, challenging the state's law prohibiting the teaching of evolution.
John T. Scopes could not recall teaching the Theory of Evolution.
The Scopes Trial, also known as the "Scopes Monkey Trial," highlighted the debate between evolution and creationism in public education. Despite John Scopes being found guilty of teaching evolution in a Tennessee school, the trial brought national attention to the issue and helped shift public opinion towards the acceptance of evolution. It also contributed to the ongoing discussions on the separation of church and state in education.
he broke the law for teaching evolution
In 1925 the State of Tennessee accused substitute high school teacher John T. Scopes of violating state law by teaching human evolution in a state-funded school. The trial is known as the Scopes Trial or the Scopes Monkey Trial. Scopes was found guilty and fined $100. The verdict subsequently was overturned.
he broke the law for teaching evolution
The Scopes Trial, formally known as "The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes" took place in Dayton, Tennessee.
Scopes broke the law by teaching evolution.
In 1925 the State of Tennessee accused substitute high school teacher John T. Scopes of violating state law by teaching human evolution in a state-funded school. The trial is known as the Scopes Trial or the Scopes Monkey Trial. Scopes was found guilty and fined $100. The verdict subsequently was overturned. The trial featured two famous attorneys. William Jennings Bryan argued for the prosecution. Clarence Darrow represented Scopes.
Convicted
In 1925 the State of Tennessee accused substitute high school teacher John T. Scopes of violating state law by teaching human evolution in a state-funded school. The trial is known as the Scopes Trial or the Scopes Monkey Trial. Scopes was found guilty and fined $100. The verdict subsequently was overturned. The trial featured two famous attorneys. William Jennings Bryan argued for the prosecution. Clarence Darrow represented Scopes.
Dayton, Tennessee, USA
In the end, the jury convicted Scopes and fined him $100. In 1927 the Tennessee Supreme Court voided the fine, though not the conviction itself, on a technicality.
One famous court case of the 1920s was the Scopes Monkey Trial in 1925. This trial centered around a high school teacher, John Scopes, who was accused of violating a Tennessee law by teaching evolution in the classroom. The trial gained national attention and highlighted the tension between science and religion in American society at the time.
The State of Tennessee v. John Scopes, (1925)Scopes went to trial immediately before the US Supreme Court began incorporating the First Amendment to the States in Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925). At the time Scopes' case was heard, there was no obligation on the part of Tennessee to abide by the First Amendment of the US Constitution.Scopes v. State, 154 Tenn. 105, (1927)The Tennessee Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision on appeal in Scopes v. State, (1927), and rejected Scopes' First Amendment argument on the grounds that Tennessee was permitted to regulate his speech in the classroom because he was an "employee of the state of Tennessee or of a municipal agency of the state" and under contract to work for an institution of the state. The Court held that Scopes' First Amendment rights were only abridged while performing an official service (teaching) for the state, but were untouched elsewhere.