0
What else can I help you with?
Which discovery vastly improve the quality of life homo erectus?
firefire
Which discovery vastly improved the aqulity of life for Homo erectus?
The discovery of fire vastly improved the quality of life for Homo erectus. Fire provided protection from predators, warmth in cold environments, and a means to cook food, which made it easier to digest and provided access to a wider range of nutrients. Additionally, fire allowed Homo erectus to extend their waking hours into the night, which increased their productivity and social interactions.
What was life like in 1898?
Life was pretty simple in 1898. There were very few bathtubs, telephones and televisions. Most people were born at home and their doctor never went to college. The average wage was about .22 cents per hour.
Difference between early man and modern man?
Early Man vs Modern ManEarly man and modern man could be easily distinguished from each other as the differences in lifestyle would provide a better platform to discuss rather than the anatomy and morphology. The question of defining an early man should be cleared out first as it either could be the first of man-like apes, known as Australopithecus afarensis, or the aboriginal people. Interestingly, recent fossil evidence reveals that the complexity of human evolution is very high and the present knowledge is far from truth. Thus, instead of being lost in the history which is few million years old and barely known, it would rather make more sense to discuss the recent early men, the aborigines. Indeed, the aboriginal men are in the same taxonomic group, Homo sapiens, as the modern man.Early ManAustralian Aborigines, Red Indians, Sri Lankan Veddas, Japanese Ainu, Kung Bushmen of Africa, Mayans of Mexico… etc were some of the dominant inhabitants of the Earth before the establishment of the modern man. They are culturally different among themselves, and the geographical boundaries viz. oceans have been the main extrications. These early men lived with the nature and, most importantly, they utilized the natural resources in a sustainable manner. Indigenous people lived in tribes those were composed of family units while some were nomadic. These un-urbanized self and sustaining societies had very simple lifestyles with primary hunting methods and simply sheltered houses. They followed in spiritual beliefs more often than not. The development of technology was very low during the time they were thriving on the Earth, which was at least several thousand years ago from the present. The communication between distant places was primary as the loud sounds were frequently used as signals to others. Travelling and transportation took more time and effort to complete. At present the indigenous people or true early man is declining in numbers. There are only about 5000 of them living in over 70 countries.Modern ManModern man is vastly different culturally among continents as well as among countries. In addition, these cultural differences could extend even more within a country. With the globalization takes place, those cultural differences will become narrower. Physical barriers within modern men could not restrict them to isolate from others as the technologies arose to travel and transport over oceans and through aerial routes. Lifestyle of modern man is complex with increasing needs for several things viz. food, shelter, power, money, attraction… etc. Hunting has become a least interested foraging method hence, livestock management has become prominent for the need of proteins. One of the sounding characteristics of the modern man is the development of communication techniques. Through internet, e-mailing, social networking, and telephones the communication has developed. However, the modern man is still in the increasing mode in terms of population size, it was almost 6. 8 Billion by 2009.Early Man Vs Modern ManRead more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-early-man-and-vs-modern-man/#ixzz20Ea9IkEm
Did we evolve from chimpanzees or did God create us?
Note:Please note that there exists no hypothesis or theory that has mankind descending from chimpanzees or any other kind of modern non-human ape. One should read the below answers as answering the question "Did we evolve from apes or did God create us".Answer:That really depends on your world view. If you are a religious person who believes in a particular creation myth--a myth is a collection of stories that describe the beliefs of a culture--then you are more likely going to reject anything that contradicts your beliefs. In such cases, people feel personal experiences trump scientific evidence. If you are less religious or more science-minded, you are more likely to accept the evidence that shows man and chimps had a common ancestor who lived in Africa roughly 7 million years ago. Genetics, anatomy, psychology, and paleontology supports this. However, again, it depends on your world view.Answer:The above is one view, but as someone who has researched this topic from both the "religious" and "scientific" perspectives, that is not all there is to it. Though it is presented to the public that ALL the scientific evidence points to evolution, it doesn't. There is scientific evidence for creation, too, and the evidence for evolution is not conclusive, making believing in creation more than a mere "creation myth."If you want an answer to whether we evolved from chimpanzees or were created by God, it is something you have to decide for yourself. Some will claim that creation is totally religious based and that evolution is totally science based, which is just not the case. In order to come to an informed decision, you should approach the issue from the scientific perspective and find what science is available for each view. Don't expect your search to take a short time, though. The information is out there, but it takes effort to find it and put all the information together.Answer:The Jewish answer is that we have an unbroken national tradition of 3300 years to the Revelation at Sinai. God states that He created the universe (Genesis 1:1; Exodus 20:10) and human beings (Genesis ch.1-2). This tradition is accepted by Christianity and Islam also. God's creation of the universe explains the vast wisdom found within it.There are also some people who believe in Creation without quoting the Bible. Their reasoning includes:1) The glaring lack of transitional fossils has been noted by the evolutionists themselves, such as this statement from the famous paleontologist and evolutionist George G. Simpson; quote: "The regular lack of transitional fossils is not confined to primates alone, but is an almost universal phenomenon.""The lack of transitional series cannot be explained as being due to the scarcity of material. The deficiencies are real; they will never be filled" (Nilsson, N. Heribert)."To the unprejudiced, the fossil record of plants is in favor of special creation" (Corner, E.J.H., Contemporary Botanical Thought).2) Instances of falsifying of evidence by evolutionists, such as Haeckel's drawings, Archaeoraptor, the Cardiff "specimen," and Piltdown Man."Haeckel exaggerated the similarities [between embryos of different species] by idealizations and omissions, in a procedure that can only be called fraudulent. His drawings never fooled embryologists, who recognized his fudgings right from the start. The drawings, despite their noted inaccuracies, entered into the standard student textbooks of biology. Once ensconced in textbooks, misinformation becomes cocooned and effectively permanent, because textbooks copy from previous texts. We do, I think, have the right to be both astonished and ashamed by the century of mindless recycling that has led to the persistence of these drawings in a large number, if not a majority, of modern textbooks (Stephen Gould).Dr. Jonathan Wells published a book in 2002 entitled Icons of Evolution. Dr. Wells states that the book shows that "the best-known 'evidences' for Darwin's theory have been exaggerated, distorted or even faked."3) Creationists see the "survival of the fittest" and the dating of rock layers by fossils as being perfect tautologies.4) The fact that some qualified, educated, normal scientists do not believe in evolution. Or at least question it, even if they still preach evolution: "Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by facts. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views. In all this great museum, there is not a particle of evidence of the transmutation of species" (Dr. Etheridge, Paleontologist of the British Museum)."To postulate that the development and survival of the fittest is entirely a consequence of chance mutations seems to me a hypothesis based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts. It amazes me that this is swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without murmur of protest" (Sir Ernest Chain, Nobel Prize winner).5) The fact that there is a shared, worldwide tradition among every ancient society that the world was created.6) Evolving of new species has not been witnessed during known history.7) Mutations are harmful, not beneficial. One of the tasks of DNA and of long-term breeding is to avoid or repair any changes brought about by mutations. This means that our genetic apparatus is programmed to resist change.8) Mutations, even if beneficial, do not create new organs.9) The fact that a great number of fossils have been found in the "wrong" rock-layers according to what evolutionary paleontology would require.10) The fact that you need DNA to make DNA. No genetic code can be demonstrated to have arisen by chance, together with the ability to read that code and carry out its instructions. Information does not arise spontaneously; and there is an incredible amount of information in even the tiniest cell."A living cell is so awesomely complex that its interdependent components stagger the imagination and defy evolutionary explanations" (Michael Denton, author)."The astounding structural complexity of a cell" (U.S. National Library of Medicine).Concerning a single structure within a cell: "Without the motor protein, the microtubules don't slide and the cilium simply stands rigid. Without nexin, the tubules will slide against each other until they completely move past each other and the cilium disintegrates. Without the tubulin, there are no microtubules and no motion. The cilium is irreducibly complex. Like a mousetrap, it has all the properties of design and none of the properties of natural selection" (Michael Behe, prof. of biophysics).11) The problem of the impossibility of abiogenesis in general. "The concept of abiogenesis is not science. It's fantasy" (J.L. Wile, Ph.D.).12) The fact that evolution was once used as support for the belief that Blacks (or others) are less than highly-evolved humans. "Darwin was also convinced that the Europeans were evolutionarily more advanced than the black races" (Steven Rose, author). He also "reasoned that males are more evolutionarily advanced than females" (B. Kevics, author).13. The first and second laws of thermodynamics point clearly to a Creator, since things undergo entropy rather than get more orderly over time.14. "Radiometric techniques may not be the absolute dating methods that they are claimed to be. Age-estimates on a given geological stratum by different radiometric methods are often very different. There is no absolutely reliable long-term radiological clock. The uncertainties inherent in radiometric dating are disturbing to geologists and evolutionists." William D. Stansfield, Ph.D., Instructor of Biology, California Polytechnic State University.15. "Even total rock systems may be open during metamorphism and may have their isotopic systems changed, making it impossible to determine their geologic age." Prof. Gunter Faure (Department of Geology, The Ohio State University, Columbus.)16 a). At current rates of erosion the amount of sea-floor sediments actually found do not support a "billions of years" age for the Earth.b) The amount of Sodium Chloride in the sea, also, is a small fraction of what the "old Earth" theory would postulate.c) The Earth's magnetic field is decaying too fast to extrapolate a long age for the Earth.d) The rate of accumulation of Moon-dust has been measured; and the amount of dust on the Moon was found to be vastly less than what scientists had predicted before the Moon-landings.e) Helium is generated by radioactive elements as they decay. The escape of this helium into the atmosphere can be measured. According to the Evolutionary age of the Earth there should be much more helium in the atmosphere, instead of the 0.05% that is actually there.
Which discovery vastly improved the quality of life for Homo erectus?
The discovery of controlling fire greatly improved the quality of life for Homo erectus. This allowed for cooking food, providing warmth, and protection from predators, which contributed to improved nutrition and enhanced social interactions.
Which discovery vastly improve the quality of life homo erectus?
firefire
Which discovery vastly improved the aqulity of life for Homo erectus?
The discovery of fire vastly improved the quality of life for Homo erectus. Fire provided protection from predators, warmth in cold environments, and a means to cook food, which made it easier to digest and provided access to a wider range of nutrients. Additionally, fire allowed Homo erectus to extend their waking hours into the night, which increased their productivity and social interactions.
Why are microscopes better now then was before?
The quality and magnification of the lenses has vastly improved over early models.
How reliable are virtual phones?
Yes, virtual phones have vastly improved in quality over the years, there is no sound lags, echoes, or distorted noises, it is really worth the switch.
What does 'revamped interface' mean?
It means that the user interface has been vastly redesigned and hopefully improved.
Is the present safety of f1 drivers better than the Past?
Yes. The safety aspects of the car and also the track have been vastly improved.
Why computers are improved?
Computers improve with advances in technology. For example - the capacity of hard-drives has vastly increased over the years, as has internet speeds etc.
How did aerial photography and radar change mapmaking?
Mapmaking has been vastly improved with the use of aerial photography and radar. The level of accuracy has increased and remote areas are now accessible.
What did antonie van leeuenhoek contribute to science in 1600?
He vastly improved on the design of microscopes. He built a very powerful microscope and used it to discover bacteria and other microscopic phenomena.
Is it better to have more than one goat?
Yes, if you have housing and money enough. They are herd animals, and their behavior is vastly improved with a companion. Also, if one is horned, the other should be, too.
Information technology and medicine?
Information technology has vastly improved the way medicine is practiced. Not only are medical records more reliable, people are able to find the right doctor for their needs using the internet.
