answersLogoWhite

0

When you say early humans you mean ancient times, before christ times or after christ times? Any how, they'll interact with each other or wouldn't depends on their personality.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Anthropology

Did humans evolve from chimps grasshopper evolve from earthworms hydra evolve from sponges?

Human Beings evolved from the mud worm (as did many other species). Scientists recently discovered that before today's Human Being, there were several species of humans that existed in Africa. References - PBS Documentary, Becoming Human: Nova (Episodes 1-3) Note: There were no human beings or chimps 4 billion years ago because at that time, the earth was only 600 million years old. Despite what some believe, Humans did not exist when dinosaurs existed.


Discuss the importance of Australopithecus?

Australopithecus is a theory of a species of creatures existing 2.6 million years ago in east, central and south Africa. This species according to the theory lived for more than 900,000 years.


How did humans evolve from chimpanzees?

Today, evolutionists insist that the underlying similarity of all animals, including man, and our ability to arrange and classify them into groups, is compelling evidence for their progressive evolution from a common ancestor. They insist that there is simply no other thinkable explanation for their similarities. Evolutionists argue further that the degree of similarity between any two animals attests to their degree of evolutionary "relatedness," and thus how recently they separated from a common ancestor. They are quite certain, for example, that the similarities between apes and humans prove they evolved from a common ape-like ancestor "only" 2 or 3 million years ago. Perhaps you heard the story of the evolutionist who dug up a fossilized fragment of an ape's jaw and promptly declared it to be an ancestor of man -- he was so excited about the find he said, "I wouldn't have seen it if I hadn't believed it." http://www.gennet.org/facts/metro05.html Since evolutionists generally do not believe that man evolved from any ape that is now living, they look to extinct apes in the fossil record to provide them with their desired evidence. Specifically, they look for any anatomical feature that looks "intermediate" between that of apes and man. Fossil apes having such features are declared to be ancestral to man (or at least collateral relatives) and are called hominids. Living apes, on the other hand, are not considered to be "hominids" they only sort of look like humans. Still, evolutionists are willing to accept certain trivial similarities between extinct apes and men as "proof" of ancestry. The most eagerly sought after evidence in fossil "hominids" is any anatomical feature that suggests bipedality (the ability to walk on two legs). http://www.gennet.org/facts/metro19.html The "missing links" are missing. And unfortunately, the field of paleoanthropology has been riddled with fraudulent claims of finding the missing link between humans and primates, to the extent that fragments of human skeletons have been combined with other species such as pigs and apes and passed off as legitimate. The modern theory concerning the evolution of man proposes that humans and apes derive from an apelike ancestor that lived on earth a few million years ago. The theory states that man, through a combination of environmental and genetic factors, emerged as a species to produce the variety of ethnicities seen today, while modern apes evolved on a separate evolutionary pathway. Overall, the evolution of man pervades as the accepted paradigm on the origin of man within the scientific community. This is not because it has been proven scientifically, but because alternative viewpoints bring with them metaphysical implications which go against the modern naturalistic paradigm. Nevertheless, a closer examination of the evidence reveals evolution to be increasingly less scientific and more reliant upon beliefs, not proof. http://www.allaboutscience.org/evolution-of-man.htmAnother Answer:Man did not evolve from apes but from a common ancestor that evolved not only into apes but also into man. Ken Miller, who in a court of law, helped defeat Intelligent Design teaching proposals in schools, best explains in his website at http://www.millerandlevine.com/km/evol/. Genetics proves humans and apes share a common ancestor.


Can you give an example of the Filipino philosophy in life?

One example of Filipino philosophy in life is "Bahala na," which loosely translates to "come what may." It reflects a sense of acceptance and resilience in the face of uncertainty and challenges, emphasizing a belief in fate or a higher power guiding one's path. This philosophy encourages embracing the present moment and finding strength in surrendering control over outcomes.


What makes the Lucy a missing link?

Lucy, the well-preserved 3.2 million-year-old Australopithecus afarensis skeleton, is considered a missing link in human evolution because she displays a mix of ape-like and human-like characteristics. These features suggest a transitional stage between earlier ape-like ancestors and more modern human species. Lucy's discovery has provided valuable insights into the evolutionary path that led to the emergence of the Homo genus.