The inhabitants of Cahokia were Native Americans. Known as mound builders, they had a very advanced civilization before Europeans set foot in North America. They abandoned the area they held around the Mississippi River, and it is unknown what happened to them, or who their descendants may be.
Using information from research to solve problems that humans face every day. More so it refers to the application of anthropological data, perspectives, theory, and methods to identify, assess, and solve contemporary social problems.
Tacit culture in Anthropology refers to parts of culture that are explicit or directly observable. Social scientists have argued that it is at points of conflict that tacit culture becomes visible.For example, think of a checkout queue at a store. There is no signage that explicitly tells you to wait behind the people already standing in line, or any information on how close you should stand to the person in front of you. However, you have probably learned these rule via observation in your day to day life.When someone doesn't follow tacit cultural rules there is normally some form of sanctioning. This can be things like glaring at people who cut in line, or moving away from someone who stands too close to you.Also, tacit culture goes beyond rules. It includes language use (ever heard an older person misuse slang) and object use (how we use cultural artifacts), etc.Edward Hall discusses this concept in his books The Silent Language (1959) and Hidden Dimensions (1966). Arguably, this is what was also meant by Durkheim when he discusses cultural fact.I hope this is helpful.
Anthropology as being the study of populations of humanity has various applications depending on the context of the study, but it essentially is a Social Science. It belongs to the larger category--The Humanities which includes Philosophy, Psychology, Literature, Sociology, etc. These are in contrast to what are called the 'hard-sciences' ie Mathematics, Chemistry, Cosmology, etc-- these fields are deductively valid. They're self-evident, that is, the value of 2-1 (real numbers) is true in and of itself and doesn't require empirical testing or hypotheses for proof (given that you understand the values of 2, minus, 1, and equals). Anthropology is a rapidly evolving area of study that requires the creation of a narrative (the hypothesis) from immense, and often contradicting data sets. Further, a natural consequence of Anthropological investigation is the competition of theories. The various scientists, belonging to their respective theories, essentially compete for evidence and whoever has the most evidence at the end of the day earns the title of 'Dominant Theory'.
The term "Cradle of Humanity" refers to where mankind first appeared on Earth. There are varying opinions between theological beliefs and even amongst scientists. According to the Talmud, the Hebrew's opinion was that their Semetic race was descended from Adam whom the texts describe as "ruddy", which translates to "red". The writings state that after being expelled they settled East of Eden. The Noah story also points to a Western orgin. Red hair and skin was a rarity in much of the Old World. The simplified Biblical opinion is; all of mankind started in Eden and the "begat" lineages are provided. However, a minor chink in the story is it states their descendants found wives in a land named Nod. There are also snags with the Nephilim and Sons of God taking wives of the Daughter's of Man. None of the origins of other races are provided. A common opinion also exists that Native Americans originated from the yellow race in Asia. However, Ignatious Donnelly, noted several inconsistencies partially disproving that theory based on studies of various Native American tribe racial characteristics. It is questionable whether primative Old World man was capable of constructing ships that could cross the Atlantic to colonize it. Continental Drift theory happened over millions of years, so remote in our past that it would have no bearing on making the journey any easier. Edgar Cayce's readings stated there were five Adams and five Eves pairs, one for each race, and that they colonized different parts of the Earth. There are various other traditional and subjective opinions in other parts of the world. Some in the Middle-East point to Babylon. Sumerians said man started there. With science it would depend if one is only concerned with where the genus Homo Sapiens Sapiens originated, or if other genera are to be included such as Cro-magnon, Neanderthal, or the highly sought after evolutionary "missing links". Even then archaeological and paleontology opinions can only be based on current known discoveries. Yet, the debate has been frequently re-opened due to older finds in various locations. There has even been found human footprints along with Dinosaur footprints in a layer of fossilized clay in America. What also must be considered is whether opinion can and should be based on different racial characteristics, which would require DNA analysis for racial markers. If so there well could be five different "Cradles of Humanity", for each of the races; white, yellow, red, brown, and black. The Stewart Synopsis based on the Human Genome Project is that the black race first appeared in North-Eastern Africa, and that all other races are descended from them. They theorise that the white race was due to albinism and suggest that being different, they were feared and expelled. There are arguments against this theory due to the dominance of black genes. Even assuming genetic mutations, albino genes are subordinant, and extremely rare (Only one in thirty-five African's carry the ressessive albino gene markers). Each albino parent would still retain dominate DNA markers and would most likely sire black children, or children with black dominent/albino subordinant genes. Albino offspring are typically less healthy and more susceptible to physical difficulties than non-albino offspring of the same parents. If one approaches it from the survival of the fittest evolutionary standard, then even segregated from their ancestrial tribes, one would expect albinism to mostly breed out after several generations, not to become more prolific. The Stewart Synopsis suggests that some white race traits such as blonde hair will be fully bred out within the next 200 years. This remains to be seen. Where is the true Cradle of Humanity? We may never know. Carbon dating becomes highly inaccurate after a certain point of time, as does other methods. Like I said, new things popping up every day. Now National Geographics says there were Hobbits: (See: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/10/1027_041027_homo_floresiensis.html)
i am you can trace it
The largest was Cahokia, near modern day St. Louis, Missouri.
The United States of America and the United Kingdom.
No, although they have a common ancestor
Yes...I know one of Sgt Yorks' descendants in Tennessee....what info are you looking for?
Abraham's descendants are the modern day Arabs and Jews. In the Bible God promises to bless Abraham and his descendants as an appreciation of their faithfulness. This covenant is the root of the modern day religions of Judaism, Islam, and Christianity.
Wooly mammoths have no modern day direct descendants, but they were closely related to the ancestors of modern elephants.
Cahokia can be found in the present day state of Illinois. It is across the Mississippi River from St Louis, Missouri.
Cahokia Mounds State Historic Site is located on the site of an ancient Native American city (c. 600-1400 CE). It sits directly across the Mississippi River from modern St. Louis, Missouri.
In present day city of St. Louis in the Mississippi Valley was where early people built Cahokia.
It is located in present day Illinois .
It is located in present day Illinois .