Europeans considered Africans as "savage" due to their lack of familiarity with African cultures and customs. This perception was influenced by stereotypes and biases that European societies held towards non-European civilizations during the Age of Exploration. The term "Indian" may have been used interchangeably with "savage" to refer to any non-European peoples encountered during this period.
The opposite gender of Indian is generally considered to be non-Indian or of a different nationality depending on the context.
The proper name is Native American. The term "red Indian" is considered outdated and derogatory.
Tisquantum, later known as Squanto, did not recognize the label "Indian" because it was a term used by Europeans to describe the indigenous peoples of the Americas. The term was not part of his own cultural identity or language.
The term "Indian giver" is considered offensive. A synonym could be "one who reneges on a promise or gift."
The Africans were not enslaved by European countries as a result of the Spanish conquest of the Americas. It started shortly after Columbus arrived, but was a slow process. They needed the Africans because the Indian population was dwindling as a result of the hard labor they had to endure, of which they weren't used to before the conquests took place. They believed that the stronger African peoples were better equipped to handle such chores, so they started enslaving and trading Africans to many different countries who needed the extra hands working on plantations.
They are Amerindians,Europeans, Africans,Portuguese, East Indian & Chinese.
Because Africans were strangers to the Americans, so they wouldn't have allies or places to hide. Additionally, the Native Americans had much weaker immune systems than Africans because Africans had developed around the same livestock that Europeans had. This made the Africans more disease resistant. Africans were also able to put up with muich more abuse, on average, than Native Americans without fainting or dying.
the arrival of the europeans in the Indian subcontinent were a large land mass shered by both civilizations
Yes, the Declaration of Independence does include the phrase "merciless Indian savages." It is found in the document's list of grievances against King George III, accusing him of inciting Native American attacks on the American colonists.
The communities with the Europeans and the Indian was bad. This trade started a war between the two.The trade with European and the Indian did not go to good. The trade started a war.
The Declaration of Independence's reference to "merciless Indian savages" reinforced negative stereotypes of Native Americans as violent and uncivilized, contributing to the dehumanization and marginalization of indigenous peoples during that time period.
they took their furs
They traded with Europeans in the 1500's.
Savages and annihilated. ~Apex
The Declaration of Independence reinforced the perception of indigenous peoples as "savages" during the colonial era by referring to them as merciless Indian "savages" in the list of grievances against the British Crown. This language perpetuated negative stereotypes and justified the colonists' actions against Native Americans.
well, if you mean in slavery they were replaced by the Africans, mostly because the Indians were introduced to many diseases , they were not immune to them, so when over half died they decided to stop and what do you know there were African in the triangular triad route so they new there were diseases already over there and most were immune to them ,so they picked them up and replaced the Indian's.
Seven Years' War